Definition:With average (WA)
📋 With average (WA) is a marine insurance coverage term indicating that the policy responds to partial losses (known as "average" in marine insurance parlance) — not only to total losses. The term historically distinguishes broader coverage from the more restrictive "free of particular average" (FPA) condition, under which the insurer pays only for total losses, general average contributions, and losses caused by specifically enumerated perils. "With average" policies thus offer the insured materially wider protection, covering damage to cargo or hull even where the loss is less than total, subject to the terms and conditions of the specific policy wording.
🔎 In traditional marine cargo wordings, a WA policy would cover particular average losses — meaning accidental damage to goods that falls short of a total loss — provided the damage resulted from an insured peril such as heavy weather, stranding, or collision. Many WA policies incorporated a franchise or deductible threshold, meaning partial losses below a stated percentage of the insured value were excluded to filter out minor or inevitable damage. The Institute Cargo Clauses, which largely superseded the older WA and FPA terminology from 1982 onward, repackaged these coverage levels into the A, B, and C clause sets. Institute Cargo Clauses (B) and (C) correspond roughly to the old WA and FPA concepts respectively, while the all-risks Institute Cargo Clauses (A) go further still. Despite this modernization, the WA terminology persists in some markets, older policy forms, and in general industry discussion.
🌍 Understanding the WA concept matters because it sits at the heart of a fundamental decision in cargo underwriting: how much partial-loss exposure the insurer agrees to accept. In commodity trades — grain, minerals, timber — where some degree of transit damage is statistically near-certain, the distinction between WA and FPA terms has direct pricing and claims implications. Brokers advising clients on cargo placements still need fluency in these traditional terms, both to interpret legacy policies and to explain to clients how modern Institute clause structures compare. In certain Asian and Latin American markets, older-style WA wordings remain in active use alongside or instead of Institute clauses, making the term a living part of the global marine insurance vocabulary rather than a purely historical artifact.
Related concepts: