Breath: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24:
}}
📘 '''''{{Tooltip|Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art}}''''' is a popular science book by journalist {{Tooltip|James Nestor}}, published by {{Tooltip|Riverhead Books}} on 26 May 2020. <ref name="PRH2020" />
It argues that breathing habits—especially nasal versus mouth breathing and slower, lighter rhythms—shape sleep, cardiovascular, and mental health, weaving history, physiology, and self-experiments such as a {{Tooltip|Stanford}} trial alternating enforced mouth- and nose-breathing. <ref name="PWReview2020">{{cite web |title=Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art |url=https://www.publishersweekly.com/9780735213616 |website=Publishers Weekly |date=19 March 2020 |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref>
The book is structured in three parts and ten chapters (e.g., “Nose,” “Exhale,” “Slow,” “Less,” “Chew,” “Hold It”). <ref name="MarmotTOC" />
Reviewers describe the prose as an engaging reported narrative that blends travelogue with accessible science. <ref name="Kirkus2020">{{cite web |title=BREATH: THE NEW SCIENCE OF A LOST ART |url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/james-nestor/breath-new-science/ |website=Kirkus Reviews |date=20 April 2020 |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref><ref name="BGlobe2020">{{cite news |last=Miller |first=Stuart |title=Yes, changing how you breathe will help you live longer |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/05/21/arts/living-breathing/ |work=The Boston Globe |date=21 May 2020 |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref>
It became a {{Tooltip|New York Times bestseller}} and a {{Tooltip|Washington Post Notable Nonfiction Book of 2020}}, and—according to the publisher—has sold more than three million copies in 44 languages. <ref name="PRH2020" /><ref name="WPostNotable2020">{{cite news |title=50 notable works of nonfiction in 2020 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/50-notable-works-of-nonfiction-in-2020/2020/11/16/37f4c4de-2069-11eb-b532-05c751cd5dc2_story.html |work=The Washington Post |date=19 November 2020 |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref>
== Part I – The experiment ==
Line 65:
=== Chapter 10 – Fast, Slow, and Not at All ===
⏱️ On {{Tooltip|Avenida Paulista}} in {{Tooltip|São Paulo}}, Nestor meets {{Tooltip|Luíz Sérgio Álvares DeRose}}, a teacher of pre-modern {{Tooltip|pranayama}} who treats yoga as a technology of breathing and attention. Two questions frame the visit: how heavy Breathing+ protects cold-exposed practitioners, and how slow practices keep monks warm without strain. Lab reports capture both poles: {{Tooltip|Bön}} and Buddhist meditators sitting in 40°F rooms with 49°F wet sheets raise body temperature by double digits while lowering metabolic rate by as much as 64%, results documented in {{Tooltip|Nature}} and reported by {{Tooltip|Harvard}} researchers. At the other extreme, deliberate hyperventilation spikes adrenaline and leaves some practitioners able to consume more oxygen long after the session ends. Between these poles sits {{Tooltip|Sudarshan Kriya}}, a four-phase sequence—om-chanting, breath restriction, 4-4-6-2 pacing, then extended fast breathing—that can shift mood and physiology at scale. The patterns differ but the logic is the same: fast to stimulate, slow to stabilize, sometimes not at all to reset—always away from water, cars, and cliffs. A boundary line remains: breath is powerful and limited. Match the cadence to the goal—use speed to spark, slowness to soothe, and stillness to rewire—because each lever adjusts {{Tooltip|CO₂}}, pH, and autonomic set points; these complement medicine, not replace it. ''No breathing can heal stage IV cancer.''
''—Note: The above summary follows the Riverhead hardcover edition (26 May 2020; ISBN 978-0-7352-1361-6).''<ref name="PRH2020">{{cite web |title=Breath by James Nestor: 9780735213616 |url=https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/547761/breath-by-james-nestor/ |website=Penguin Random House |publisher=Penguin Random House |date=26 May 2020 |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref><ref name="OCLC1138996691">{{cite web |title=Breath : the new science of a lost art |url=https://search.worldcat.org/title/Breath-%3A-the-new-science-of-a-lost-art/oclc/1138996691 |website=WorldCat |publisher=OCLC |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref><ref name="MarmotTOC">{{cite web |title=Breath : the new science of a lost art |url=https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b61211722 |website=Marmot Catalog |publisher=Marmot Library Network |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref>
== Background & reception ==
🖋️ '''Author & writing'''. Nestor is a science journalist and author of ''{{Tooltip|Deep}}'' (2014); the publisher notes that ''Breath'' follows his reporting across labs, ancient burial sites, Soviet facilities, choir schools, and city streets to examine how breathing works and why it went awry. <ref name="PRH2020" /> He frames the book as a “scientific adventure,” linking breathing patterns to health and recounting how recurrent respiratory issues led him to
📈 '''Commercial reception'''. Nestor’s site records that ''Breath'' spent 20 weeks on the {{Tooltip|''New York Times'' bestseller list}}
👍 '''Praise'''. ''{{Tooltip|Kirkus Reviews}}'' called the book “a welcome, invigorating user’s manual for the respiratory system.” <ref name="Kirkus2020" /> ''{{Tooltip|Publishers Weekly}}'' praised it as a “fascinating ‘scientific adventure’” that convincingly argues everyday breathing is “vital to get right.” <ref name="PWReview2020" /> {{Tooltip|The ''Boston Globe''}} highlighted its “entertaining, eerily well-timed” explanations of proper breathing and its potential to change daily habits. <ref name="BGlobe2020" /> ''{{Tooltip|Library Journal}}'' deemed it “highly recommended,” noting the clear synthesis of research, interviews, and techniques. <ref
👎 '''Criticism'''. In the ''{{Tooltip|Wall Street Journal}}'', {{Tooltip|Sam Kean}} faulted the book for not applying enough skepticism to “dicey” evidence and for underplaying placebo effects. <ref name="WSJReview2020">{{cite news |last=Kean |first=Sam |title='Breath' Review: Eager Breather |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/breath-review-eager-breather-11590953832 |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=31 May 2020 |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref> Psychiatrist {{Tooltip|Kate Womersley}}, writing in ''{{Tooltip|The Spectator}}'', argued that Nestor leans heavily on anecdotes and makes overbroad claims about {{Tooltip|nitric oxide}} and {{Tooltip|CO₂}}, cautioning against turning “enhanced breathing” into a commercial self-optimization trend. <ref name="Spectator20200801">{{cite news |last=Womersley |first=Kate |title=We all breathe – 25,000 times a day – so why aren’t we better at it? |url=https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/we-all-breathe-25-000-times-a-day-so-why-aren-t-we-better-at-it/ |work=The Spectator |date=1 August 2020 |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref> A trade article in ''{{Tooltip|Sleep Review}}'' welcomed the book’s accessibility but warned that popular practices like mouth-taping should not displace clinical diagnosis and care
🌍 '''Impact & adoption'''. ''{{Tooltip|Fresh Air}}'' devoted a full episode to Nestor on 27 May 2020, amplifying the book’s core ideas to a national audience. <ref name="FreshAir20200527">{{cite web |title=How The 'Lost Art' Of Breathing Can Impact Sleep And Resilience |url=https://freshairarchive.org/segments/how-lost-art-breathing-can-impact-sleep-and-resilience |website=Fresh Air Archive (WHYY/NPR) |date=27 May 2020 |access-date=19 October 2025}}</ref> The book was shortlisted for the 2021 {{Tooltip|Royal Society Science Book Prize}}
== Related content & more ==
| |||