On Writing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 40:
🗣️ '''3 – Third Foreword.''' I set one more ground rule: the editor is always right, even though no writer accepts every note, because all of us fall short of editorial perfection. To make that concrete, I credit Chuck Verrill—who has edited many of my novels—with shaping this book as well. The foreword frames editing not as a punishment but as collaboration that turns human draft into readable prose. It reminds working writers that a second intelligence can see audience needs and tonal slips the originator misses. The core idea is humility: solitary drafting needs an external check to reach its best form. The mechanism is iterative revision with a trusted editor, a habit that aligns with the book’s emphasis on practice over pose. ''Put another way, to write is human, to edit is divine.''
📜 '''4 – C.V..''' Mary Karr’s The Liars’ Club showed me what total recall on the page looks like; I don’t have that, so I offer snapshots. I was raised by my mother, Nellie Ruth Pillsbury King, after my father ran out when I was two and my brother David was four, and our moves made childhood herky‑jerky. The earliest fixed scene is in Aunt Ethelyn and Uncle Oren’s garage in Durham, Maine: two and a half or three, I lug a cement cinderblock like the Ringling Brothers Strongboy, take a wasp sting to the ear, and mash all five toes when the block drops. In Wisconsin I remember a teenage babysitter, Eula—maybe Beulah—big as a house and laughing with a thunderclap tucked inside it. At six I endured repeated eardrum lancings, the alcohol smell sharp and the needle long. Caught copying a Combat Casey comic into a school tablet, I was told to write one of my own, and I did—four pencil‑printed pages about four magic animals led by a white bunny named Mr. Rabbit Trick. The aim here is narrow: not a full autobiography, just how a writer was formed by ordinary shocks, voices, and work. Memory is the method; fix the small, named details and let them stand for the long road from kid to working storyteller. ''There are no lines—only snapshots, most out of focus.''
🧠 '''5 – What Writing Is.''' Telepathy is the answer, proved in real time: on a snowy morning in December 1997 I sit at my desk under the eave, you sit somewhere down‑timeline, and we still share the same picture. See a table with a red cloth; on it a cage the size of a small fish aquarium; inside, a white rabbit with a pink nose and pink‑rimmed eyes, contentedly working a carrot stub. On the rabbit’s back the number 8 is written in blue ink, and despite distance and time we both receive it. Scientists like J. B. Rhine tried to measure this, but the better proof is the image now in both our heads. Books make the magic portable; the strongest signals arrive in the private far‑seeing place each of us builds for sending and receiving. Precision matters: rough comparisons invite a reader to help, while prissy over‑measurement turns prose into an instruction manual. Because words carry images and intent mind to mind, the page deserves attention and respect, not posturing. The chapter’s core is a single circuit—writer encodes, reader decodes—and it works when we honor the exchange. The mechanism is deliberate word choice that supplies just enough data for the same picture to appear in two skulls. ''You must not come lightly to the blank page.''
🧰 '''6 – Toolbox.''' A John Prine lyric about a carpenter leads to my own: my grandfather, Guy Pillsbury, kept up the Winslow Homer place at Prout’s Neck, and when he retired my Uncle Oren inherited his massive handmade toolbox. It was a big ’un—three tiers with cunning little drawers, dark wooden slats bound with brass, big lunchbox‑style latches, a silk lining printed with pinkish‑red cabbage roses, and grabhandles on the sides. As kids we could barely lift it; loaded, it weighed somewhere between eighty and a hundred‑twenty pounds, which is why Oren set it down with a sigh before simple jobs like replacing a torn screen. That day he used a single screwdriver to turn eight loophead screws, then explained why he hauled the beast anyway: you don’t know what else a job will ask until you’re there. From that lesson comes the writer’s kit—a portable box you build and carry so you can seize the right tool and begin at once. On the top shelf go the common implements: vocabulary you already own and grammar you keep clean; lower levels hold habits and choices—favoring active over passive verbs, using said for dialogue attribution, treating the paragraph as the basic unit, and minding adverbs, especially in tags. Another layer carries rhythm, white space, and other preferences you develop through use. The idea is practical: master fundamentals, then add selective tools so you don’t stall when a page asks for more. The mechanism is layered competence you can take into the field, a box strengthened by work until it’s part of how you move through a story. ''It’s best to have your tools with you.''
✍️ '''7 – On Writing.'''
| |||