On Writing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 34:
''This outline follows the Scribner 20th-anniversary trade paperback (2020; ISBN 978-1-9821-5937-5).''<ref name="S&S20th">{{cite web |title=On Writing |url=https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/On-Writing/Stephen-King/9781982159375 |website=Simon & Schuster |publisher=Scribner |access-date=8 November 2025}}</ref><ref name="Marmot505">{{cite web |title=On writing : a memoir of the craft (record 505 contents) |url=https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b61999957 |website=CMC Library Catalog |publisher=Colorado Mountain College |access-date=8 November 2025}}</ref>
📖 '''1 – First Foreword.''' In the early 1990s I joined the Rock Bottom Remainders, a writers’ rock band dreamed up by San Francisco publicist-musician Kathi Kamen Goldmark, with Dave Barry on lead guitar, Ridley Pearson on bass, Barbara Kingsolver on keyboards, Robert Fulghum on mandolin, and Amy Tan among the singers. What was meant to be a one-off at the American Booksellers Convention turned into occasional tours, complete with ringers on sax and drums and Al Kooper as an early musical guru. Before a Miami Beach gig, over Chinese food, I asked Amy what question she never got in the reader Q&As; after thinking, she said that no one ever asked about the language. I had been toying with a small book on writing for a year or more but distrusted my motives and didn’t want to add to the gas-bag shelf. Her answer reframed the project around the day job—how stories get told on paper and how prose choices carry that work. The chapter uses a band’s greenroom candor and the specificity of names, places, and jobs to set a practical, nuts-and-bolts tone for the book that follows. It establishes the main theme: treat writing as craft grounded in language, and build a book that shows where that craft comes from and how it works. ''This book is dedicated to Amy Tan, who told me in a very simple and direct way that it was okay to write it.''
🧭 '''2 – Second Foreword.''' I explain that this will be a short book because most writing manuals are padded, and fiction writers—myself included—often don’t fully know why their work succeeds or fails. As a counterexample I point to William Strunk Jr. and E. B. White’s The Elements of Style, a slim eighty-five-page volume notable for its lack of filler. I recommend that every aspiring writer read it, not as scripture but as a model of clear, economical instruction that respects the reader’s time. The tone here is blunt and workmanlike, promising a guide that favors directness over mystique and rules of thumb over academic fog. The core idea is economy: cut what doesn’t serve meaning, and let structure and word choice carry the load. The mechanism is disciplined concision—principles applied sentence by sentence so that guidance remains useful at the desk. ''Rule 17 in the chapter titled Principles of Composition is “Omit needless words.” I will try to do that here.''
🗣️ '''3 – Third Foreword.''' I set one more ground rule: the editor is always right, even though no writer accepts every note, because all of us fall short of editorial perfection. To make that concrete, I credit Chuck Verrill—who has edited many of my novels—with shaping this book as well. The foreword frames editing not as a punishment but as collaboration that turns human draft into readable prose. It reminds working writers that a second intelligence can see audience needs and tonal slips the originator misses. The core idea is humility: solitary drafting needs an external check to reach its best form. The mechanism is iterative revision with a trusted editor, a habit that aligns with the book’s emphasis on practice over pose. ''Put another way, to write is human, to edit is divine.''
📜 '''4 – C.V..'''
| |||