Atomic Habits: Difference between revisions

'''''Atomic Habits''''' (2018) is a nonfiction book by {{Tooltip|James Clear}} that lays out a practical system for building good habits and breaking bad ones. Clear organizes behavior change around the Four Laws—make it obvious, attractive, easy, and satisfying—built on a four-stage habit loop of cue, craving, response, and reward.<ref name="JCsum">{{cite web |title=Atomic Habits Summary |url=https://jamesclear.com/atomic-habits-summary |website=James Clear |publisher=James Clear |access-date=3 November 2025}}</ref> The hardcover arranges twenty concise chapters into six parts that move from fundamentals through the four laws to advanced tactics. Reviewers have described it as a step-by-step manual for changing routines.<ref name="FT2018b">{{cite news |title=FT business books of the month: November edition |url=https://www.ft.com/content/dbf506bc-dd21-11e8-9f04-38d397e6661c |work=Financial Times |date=8 November 2018 |access-date=3 November 2025}}</ref> Coverage has also popularized tactics from the book, including the “two-minute rule” for starting habits with the smallest possible action.<ref name="BI2018">{{cite news |title=Make progress on a goal using the 2-minute rule |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/make-progress-on-goal-2-minute-rule-2018-12 |work=Business Insider |date=26 December 2018 |access-date=3 November 2025}}</ref> By 21 November 2024, the publisher reported more than 20 million copies sold, translations into 65 languages, and 260 weeks on the {{Tooltip|New York Times bestseller list}}; the current catalogue now notes over 25 million copies sold.<ref name="PRHGlobal2024">{{cite web |title=Avery celebrates 5 years of ATOMIC HABITS & an astounding 260 weeks on the NYT bestseller list |url=https://global.penguinrandomhouse.com/announcements/avery-celebrates-5-years-of-atomic-habits-an-astounding-260-weeks-on-the-nyt-bestseller-list/ |website=Penguin Random House Global |publisher=Penguin Random House |date=21 November 2024 |access-date=3 November 2025}}</ref>

⚛️ '''1 – The Surprising Power of Atomic Habits.''' In 2003 {{Tooltip|Dave Brailsford}} took over as performance director of {{Tooltip|British Cycling}}, an organization that had won just one Olympic cycling gold since 1908 and never the {{Tooltip|Tour de France}}. He pushed the “aggregation of marginal gains,” looking for 1% improvements everywhere. Seats were redesigned and tires rubbed with alcohol for traction, while riders wore electrically heated overshorts and trained with biofeedback sensors to fine-tune workloads. Fabrics were run through a wind tunnel, and riders wore more aerodynamic indoor suits outdoors. Staff compared massage gels, brought in a surgeon to coach meticulous handwashing, and matched each athlete with a personalized mattress and pillow for better sleep. They even painted the inside of the team truck white to spot dust that could impair finely tuned bikes. Five years later, at the {{Tooltip|2008 Beijing Olympics}}, the team won about 60% of the road and track cycling golds; in {{Tooltip|London 2012}} they set nine Olympic records and seven world records. From 2012 to 2017 {{Tooltip|Team Sky}} riders added five {{Tooltip|Tour de France}} titles, and from 2007 to 2017 British cyclists amassed 178 world championships and 66 Olympic or Paralympic golds. Small advantages that compound shift trajectories far more than sporadic effort. Building systems—processes that accumulate returns—beats chasing one-off goals. ''Habits are the compound interest of self-improvement.''

👁️ '''4 – The Man Who Didn't Look Right.''' At a family gathering, a veteran paramedic studied her father-in-law’s face and insisted on a hospital visit; surgeons soon found a blocked coronary artery and operated, a pattern-recognition save {{Tooltip|Gary Klein}} documented. The brain becomes a prediction machine: after thousands of exposures, it learns subtle cues—like blood distribution in the face—that signal danger before you can explain why. Catalog current routines with a {{Tooltip|Habits Scorecard}} and use “pointing“{{Tooltip|Pointing-and-calling”calling}}” to say actions out loud. Japan’s railways institutionalize this ritual; when operators point at signals and verbalize status, errors drop by up to 85 percent and accidents by 30 percent, and {{Tooltip|New York’sYork}}’s subway saw a 57 percent fall in mis-berthed trains after adopting a point-only variant. Once cues become familiar, behavior runs on autopilot, which is why unnoticed prompts—a phone on the desk, a cookie jar on the counter—steer choices all day. Raising awareness shifts habits from the nonconscious to the deliberate, where design can help. Attention to cues precedes action, so making cues visible—and responses explicit—gives leverage over what follows. In the first law, visibility of cues is the switch that turns a habit on; awareness is the master key to redesign. ''The process of behavior change always starts with awareness.''

🏁 '''5 – The Best Way to Start a New Habit.''' In {{Tooltip|Great Britain}} in 2001, researchers followed 248 adults for two weeks and split them into three groups: a control group, a motivation group that read about exercise benefits, and a planning group that wrote exactly when and where they would work out. Results were stark: only 35–38 percent of the first two groups exercised at least once a week, but 91 percent of the planners did, thanks to a single sentence specifying time and place. This is an {{Tooltip|implementation intention—“Iintention}}—“I will [behavior] at [time] in [location]”—which taps the two most reliable cues: time and location. To go further, {{Tooltip|Habit stacking}}, popularized by {{Tooltip|BJ Fogg}}, links a new behavior to an existing one with “After [current habit], I will [new habit],” turning one action into a trigger for the next. Examples range from “After I pour coffee, I’ll meditate for one minute” to “After dinner, I’ll put my plate straight into the dishwasher,” each shrinking ambiguity about when to act. Pre-deciding removes decision fatigue and reduces friction; the cue is waiting, so the behavior fires on schedule. In this framework, specificity fuels action because the brain recognizes a clear start line. ''Many people think they lack motivation when what they really lack is clarity.''

🏠 '''6 – Motivation Is Overrated: Environment Often Matters More.''' At {{Tooltip|Massachusetts General Hospital’sHospital}}’s main cafeteria ({{Tooltip|Boston}}, 2009–2010), researchers added traffic-light labels to foods and then rearranged drink stations so water appeared in multiple, prominent coolers by the registers. Without speeches or willpower pep talks, “red” (least healthy) beverage sales fell an additional 11.4 percent in phase two, while bottled water sales rose 25.8 percent, demonstrating how choice{{Tooltip|Choice architecture}} quietly redirects behavior. The broader principle follows {{Tooltip|Lewin’s equation}}, B = f(P, E): behavior is a function of the person in their environment, and persistent habits carry multiple environmental cues. Because vision dominates attention, what is visible is what is likely; placing fruit on the counter or keeping the guitar on a stand increases use as surely as hiding the remote reduces TV time. Over time, context becomes the cue—desk equals focus, couch equals scrolling—so new habits take root fastest in new contexts that aren’t loaded with old triggers. Designing rooms by purpose (a reading chair, a phone-free bedroom, a tidy prep zone on the kitchen counter) aligns spaces with actions. Shift defaults: make desired actions friction-light and obvious, and undesired ones friction-heavy and out of sight. In this framework, environment is the silent lever that makes “obvious” effortless. ''Environment is the invisible hand that shapes human behavior.''

🔒 '''7 – The Secret to Self-Control.''' In 1971, {{Tooltip|U.S.}} congressmen learned in {{Tooltip|Vietnam}} that heroin use among American troops was widespread; follow-up studies led by {{Tooltip|Lee Robins}} later found that after returning home only about 5 percent of users were re-addicted within a year and 12 percent within three years, a reversal driven by the loss of wartime cues. Changing the setting—no easy access, no using peers, no combat stress—dissolved many cravings that rehab alone cannot, since most relapses occur when old triggers reappear. People who seem “disciplined” usually structure their lives to avoid temptation, not wrestle it hour by hour. Because cues spark cravings before awareness, the most practical tactic is to cut the signal at the source: remove apps from the home screen, keep sweets out of the house, use website blockers, change the route that passes the bar. You can break a habit yet still carry its circuitry; when the stimulus returns, the urge can reignite—hence the emphasis on making bad cues invisible. Avoiding a trigger is easier than resisting it repeatedly, so prevention beats heroic willpower. Inverting the first law—make it invisible—turns “self-control” into design rather than a daily duel. ''Self-control is a short-term strategy, not a long-term one.''

🧲 '''8 – How to Make a Habit Irresistible.''' In the 1950s, Dutch ethologist {{Tooltip|Niko Tinbergen}} showed that animals can be fooled by “supernormal stimuli,” like herring gull chicks pecking harder at an exaggerated red-tipped stick than at a real beak, or birds choosing oversized, highly marked plaster eggs over their own. In people, modern life manufactures similar exaggerated cues—hyperpalatable foods, infinite video feeds, and on-demand entertainment—that hijack attention. Habits run on a dopamine{{Tooltip|Dopamine}}-driven loop in which anticipation powers action; classic work at {{Tooltip|McGill University}} by {{Tooltip|James Olds}} and {{Tooltip|Peter Milner}} showed that animals will work relentlessly for rewarding brain stimulation, underscoring the pull of expected pleasure. To put this pull to work, pair a “want” with a “should.” At the {{Tooltip|University of Pennsylvania}}, {{Tooltip|Katherine Milkman}} and colleagues ran a nine-week field experiment with 226 gym members: those given gym-only access to page-turner audiobooks visited 51% more often than controls, and a lighter self-enforced version yielded a 29% bump, though the effect faded after {{Tooltip|Thanksgiving}}; 61% said they would pay for the gym-only audiobook device. Bundling can be combined with habit{{Tooltip|Habit stacking}} so time and place trigger the useful action and the reward follows immediately. The result is a routine you look forward to because it is the price of admission to something you already enjoy. Make the cue appealing and the behavior becomes easier to start, repeat, and keep. Engineering anticipation around the right routines gives small actions a stronger pull and lets them compound.

👥 '''9 – The Role of Family and Friends in Shaping Your Habits.''' In 1951 at {{Tooltip|Swarthmore College}}, {{Tooltip|Solomon Asch’sAsch}}’s line-judgment studies revealed how ordinary people often match a group’s wrong answers, a clean demonstration of conformity’s force. Everyday behavior follows the same pattern: people copy the habits of the close (family and friends), the many (their tribe), and the powerful (high-status models). Long-run data from the {{Tooltip|Framingham Heart Study}} mapped a social network of 12,067 people from 1971 to 2003 and found that weight gain clustered across ties; when a friend became obese, one’s own risk rose by 57%. Influence can also help: when one partner enrolls in a structured program, untreated spouses frequently improve as norms shift at home. Because belonging sets what feels “normal,” joining groups where desired actions are the default removes friction and adds approval. Identity overlap matters, so seek tribes where you share something real—runners who meet before dawn, coworkers who eat device-free lunches, or a local reading circle. When respect and status accrue to the behavior you want, repeating it feels natural rather than forced. Social proof and the craving to belong do the heavy lifting, making “attractive” automatic and durable.

🔧 '''10 – How to Find and Fix the Causes of Your Bad Habits.''' In Istanbul, a circle of former smokers described quitting after rejecting the belief that cigarettes delivered any benefit, pointing to {{Tooltip|Allen Carr’s method}} as the catalyst; by redefining the cue as a trap instead of a relief, the urge weakened. The same logic applies broadly: cravings are predictions about what a cue will do for you, and changing the story changes the desire. A small language shift—swapping “I have to” for “I get to,” a lesson from college strength coach Mark Watts—turns duties into opportunities and pulls you toward effort. Build a “motivation ritual,” a short enjoyable act before a hard habit (a favorite song before deep work, a quick walk before a tough call) so positive emotion sticks to the task and eventually the ritual itself cues focus. Because every behavior serves a deeper motive—relief, connection, status—replacing a bad habit works best when the substitute meets the same need with a cleaner outlet. With repetition, the brain learns to anticipate satisfaction from the new path and stops expecting it from the old one. Invert the Second Law—make bad habits unattractive—by rehearsing the benefits of abstaining and the costs of indulging. Reframing updates predictions at the craving stage, which makes the next response easier to change and keeps the right choice inviting while the wrong one grows dull.

🐢 '''11 – Walk Slowly, but Never Backward.''' At the {{Tooltip|University of Florida}}, photographer {{Tooltip|Jerry Uelsmann}} split his film class into two groups on day one: a “quantity” side graded on output—one hundred photos for an A, ninety for a B, eighty for a C—and a “quality” side graded on a single perfect image. After a semester of shooting, developing, and evaluating prints in the darkroom, the best photographs came from the quantity group, whose constant experimentation with lighting, composition, and exposure taught them what worked. The quality group planned and theorized but produced little, and without enough practice their results lagged. Favor action over motion: make and ship work, gather feedback, iterate. Repetition wires behavior; each rep strengthens the pathway and makes the next attempt easier. Automaticity grows from frequency more than from the calendar. Moving in small, reliable steps keeps progress steady—slow at first, but never backward—until consistency beats intensity. Build systems that make doing the right thing easy and let repetitions compound. ''The amount of time you have been performing a habit is not as important as the number of times you have performed it.''

🪶 '''12 – The Law of Least Effort.''' {{Tooltip|Oswald Nuckols}}, an IT developer from {{Tooltip|Natchez, Mississippi}}, “resets the room” after each use—placing the TV remote on the stand, arranging the pillows, folding the blanket, tossing car trash, and even wiping the toilet while the shower warms. He is not tidying for the past; he is priming the environment so the next action begins with zero friction. At scale, geography shows the same pattern: crops spread more readily across Eurasia’s east–west latitudes than along the Americas’ north–south axis because similar climates reduce the “cost” of change, letting farmers plant the same species from France to China. In daily life, the easiest option wins—people eat what is prepped, work out when the gear is laid out, and read when the book waits on the pillow. Reduce friction for good habits (prepare, pre-position, streamline steps) and add friction to bad ones (unplug the TV, keep the phone in another room). Energy costs shape behavior more than momentary motivation; the brain saves effort wherever it can. Lower the action cost and the behavior occurs more often; raise it and it fades. This is the principle in practice: tiny environmental tweaks nudge hundreds of choices each week, so small wins accumulate into durable change. ''Habits are easier to build when they fit into the flow of your life.''

⏱️ '''13 – How to Stop Procrastinating by Using the Two-Minute Rule.''' {{Tooltip|Twyla Tharp}}, the Manhattan choreographer, begins at 5:30 a.m., pulls on warm-ups, walks to the curb, and hails a taxi to the {{Tooltip|Pumping Iron gym}} at 91st Street and First Avenue; the workout lasts two hours, but the ritual is the cab. Stating the destination is the decisive moment—once she is headed to the gym, the rest unfolds with little friction. Many days hinge on similar forks in the road: change into workout clothes after work and head out, or sink into the couch and order takeout. Because early “gateway” actions carry the sequence, the surest way to beat delay is to engineer a first step that is impossible to resist. Scale any habit to a version that takes under two minutes—read one page, tie on running shoes, open the instrument case. Master the easy starter and let momentum and identity do the heavy lifting as you expand. Ritualizing the beginning removes willpower from the equation and slashes start-up costs, which raises the rate of action. Turning ambition into tiny, repeatable cues makes consistency more likely than intensity. ''“When you start a new habit, it should take less than two minutes to do.”''

🔄 '''14 – How to Make Good Habits Inevitable and Bad Habits Impossible.''' In Paris in 1830, facing a February 1831 deadline for ''{{Tooltip|Notre-Dame de Paris}}'', {{Tooltip|Victor Hugo}} asked his assistant to lock away his clothes, leaving only a shawl, so he would be forced to stay indoors and write; he finished the novel in January 1831. That move is a commitment{{Tooltip|Commitment device—adevice}}—a present choice that constrains future options so the desired behavior becomes the path of least resistance. Invert the Third Law: make bad habits difficult by adding steps, barriers, and costs. One-time decisions can lock in better behavior for years: set up automatic savings, cancel distracting subscriptions, or schedule the home router to shut off late at night. Technology extends this leverage—autopay bills on time, program thermostat setbacks, and use screen-time limits so impulses lose their window. The aim is not daily willpower but system design: restructure defaults so the right action happens even when you are tired or tempted. Precommitment and automation transfer control from fleeting urges to prior plans. In the larger arc, a single prudent setup governs thousands of future choices, turning progress from hopeful to near-inevitable. ''A commitment device is a choice you make in the present that locks in better behavior in the future.''

🧭 '''15 – The Cardinal Rule of Behavior Change.''' In the late 1990s, public health worker {{Tooltip|Stephen Luby}} left {{Tooltip|Omaha}} for {{Tooltip|Karachi, Pakistan}}, and saw that families were far more likely to keep washing their hands when the soap smelled good and produced a rich lather. Pleasant sensory feedback made the routine satisfying in the moment, so the behavior stuck even after outside prompting faded. Consumer products have long exploited this effect: flavored chewing gum and mint-forward toothpaste made everyday use feel rewarding even though the additives did not boost cleaning power. This is the Fourth Law—make it satisfying—which shows why immediate reinforcement beats distant payoffs. People carry Paleolithic brains into a delayed-return world, so time inconsistency pulls them toward choices that feel good now and away from those that pay off later. Because the near-term costs of good habits are salient while their benefits are distant, adding instant pleasure to the end of a routine keeps it alive through the early, result-free weeks. One tactic is to “make avoidance visible,” such as transferring $5 to a labeled savings account each time you skip a latte or moving $50 to a “Trip to Europe” account when you cook at home. As intrinsic rewards and identity take hold, the small external treats can recede. Tie finishes to sensory cues—pleasant endings, progress meters, visible savings—so the nervous system flags the action as worth repeating. Satisfaction closes the loop and turns one completion into the seed of the next. ''What is immediately rewarded is repeated.''

📅 '''16 – How to Stick with Good Habits Every Day.''' In 1993, at a bank in Abbotsford, British Columbia, 23-year-old stockbroker {{Tooltip|Trent Dyrsmid}} placed two jars on his desk—one with 120 paper clips, one empty—and moved a clip after each sales call until the second jar was full. The simple tally turned effort into a visible game he could win every day. Within eighteen months he was bringing in about $5 million in business, and by twenty-four he earned $75,000 a year; a six-figure job followed. This “Paper“{{Tooltip|Paper Clip Strategy”Strategy}}” has variants with hairpins and marbles to track writing, exercise sets, and more. Habit tracking scales from notebooks and food logs to calendars marked with Xs, with precedents like Benjamin Franklin’s thirteen-virtue booklet and {{Tooltip|Jerry Seinfeld’sSeinfeld}}’s “don’t break the chain” mantra in the documentary ''{{Tooltip|Comedian}}''. A tracker works on three fronts: it is obvious (a cue you can see), attractive (progress is motivating), and satisfying (crossing off a square feels good). Beware measuring the wrong thing, and automate records where possible. Turning invisible effort into visible evidence reinforces identity—proof that you are the kind of person who shows up—even on bad days. When a streak breaks, speed of recovery matters more than perfection because compounding depends on continuity. ''Never miss twice.''

🤝 '''17 – How an Accountability Partner Can Change Everything.''' Roger Fisher, a World War II pilot turned {{Tooltip|Harvard Law}} professor and founder of the {{Tooltip|Harvard Negotiation Project}}, proposed in 1981 that the {{Tooltip|U.S.}} nuclear launch codes be implanted near a volunteer’s heart so a president would need to take a life to access them—the point was to make the consequence immediate and personal. The story illustrates an inversion of the Fourth Law: make bad behavior unsatisfying by adding instant, tangible pain. Public policy shows the same dynamic at scale: {{Tooltip|New York}} passed the first seat-belt law on 1 December 1984; within five years most states followed, and by 2016 seat-belt use reached roughly 88 percent in the {{Tooltip|U.S.}} Personal “social contracts” mirror this logic. In {{Tooltip|Nashville}} in 2017, entrepreneur {{Tooltip|Bryan Harris}} wrote a habit contract co-signed by his wife and trainer, listing daily diet and weigh-in commitments and penalties ranging from paying $200 to dressing up for work and even wearing an Alabama hat despite being an Auburn fan; he escalated consequences and hit his targets. Other examples include automated public stakes, like entrepreneur {{Tooltip|Thomas Frank’sFrank}}’s pre-scheduled tweet that charges small PayPal payments if he sleeps in past 6:10. When someone is watching and costs arrive now, procrastination loses its advantage. Accountability converts reputation and financial penalties into prompts, making the desired action the easiest way to avoid pain. ''A habit contract can be used to add a social cost to any behavior.''

🧬 '''18 – The Truth About Talent (When Genes Matter and When They Don't).''' Compare two elite athletes whose bodies tell different stories: swimmer {{Tooltip|Michael Phelps}} and middle-distance runner {{Tooltip|Hicham El Guerrouj}}. Despite wearing pants with an identical inseam, Phelps’s relatively short legs and long torso are ideal for cutting through water, while El Guerrouj’s long legs and shorter upper body suit the track. Swap their sports and the same traits would turn into liabilities, a reminder that context makes characteristics either advantages or obstacles. The contrast supports choosing a “field of competition” that fits your natural inclinations so repetitions feel rewarding and improvement compounds. Personality and biology nudge preferences and skills, so habits stick more readily where the work feels like play. Rather than trying to overwrite tendencies, direct effort to domains where small wins arrive sooner and feedback loops feel good. In practice, test activities until you find a niche that returns more per unit of effort, then double down. Genes do not remove the need for deliberate practice; they point to where practice pays off faster. ''Play a game that favors your strengths.''

🎯 '''19 – The Goldilocks Rule: How to Stay Motivated in Life and Work.''' Comedian Steve Martin inched his way to mastery: over years, he expanded his routine by a minute or two at a time, kept a few proven jokes to guarantee laughs, and relied on instant audience feedback to calibrate what came next. The pattern embodies the Goldilocks Rule—work on challenges of “just manageable difficulty,” not too easy to bore you and not so hard that you break. Psychologists studying flow{{Tooltip|Flow}} describe the same sweet spot where attention locks in and action feels absorbing. Games, sports, and learning systems exploit this by stepping up difficulty only after competence grows. To apply it, pick a baseline you can repeat on dull days, then nudge the bar slightly—an extra rep, a harder piece, a marginally faster pace—so wins and errors arrive in the same session. Visible progress fuels persistence, while small misses keep you engaged enough to refine. Professionals design their routines to preserve that edge and return to it even when interest dips. Over time, consistency through boredom beats streaks of inspiration. ''The greatest threat to success is not failure but boredom.''

⚠️ '''20 – The Downside of Creating Good Habits.''' In 1986 Los Angeles, Lakers coach {{Tooltip|Pat Riley}} installed the {{Tooltip|Career Best Effort (CBE) system}}: the staff “took each player’s number” by tracking stats back to high school, credited unsung plays like diving for loose balls, and asked for roughly 1% improvement over a season; the team won the NBA title eight months later and repeated the following year. Automatic habits free attention, but they also invite complacency unless paired with deliberate practice and honest feedback. Drifting on autopilot hides small errors; sustained excellence needs periodic course corrections. A simple cadence helps: an {{Tooltip|Annual Review}} every December that tallies habits and answers three questions (what went well, what did not, what was learned) and a mid-year Integrity Report that checks core values and standards. These check-ins keep identity flexible—less “I am only this role,” more “I am the kind of person who does the work”—so life changes do not shatter motivation. Reflection restores awareness, and awareness reopens the loop of improvement. In a system designed this way, habits handle the routine while reviews upgrade the routine. ''Reflection and review is the antidote.''

🖋️ '''Author & writing'''. {{Tooltip|James Clear}} is a writer and speaker who has published on habits, decision making, and continuous improvement since 2012, and he authors the widely read 3-2-1 newsletter.<ref name="JCAbout">{{cite web |title=About James Clear |url=https://jamesclear.com/about |website=James Clear |publisher=James Clear |access-date=3 November 2025}}</ref> In his year-end note, he said he spent “three years” writing and refining the book to make it practical and example-driven.<ref name="JCAnnual2018">{{cite web |title=My 2018 Annual Review |url=https://jamesclear.com/2018-annual-review |website=James Clear |publisher=James Clear |date=31 December 2018 |access-date=3 November 2025}}</ref> The argument rests on a four-step habit loop (cue, craving, response, reward) and the Four Laws of Behavior Change, which invert for breaking bad habits.<ref name="JCsum" /> Short chapters and concrete heuristics—such as the “two-minute rule”—lower friction and encourage consistency.<ref name="BI2018" /> The structure runs from fundamentals through the four laws to advanced tactics across six parts and twenty chapters. Publisher copy notes that the book synthesizes ideas from biology, psychology, and neuroscience for a general audience.

📈 '''Commercial reception'''. Penguin Random House reported that by 21 November 2024 the book had sold more than 20 million copies worldwide, been translated into 65 languages, and logged 260 weeks on the {{Tooltip|New York Times bestseller list}}; the publisher’s current catalogue page now says “over 25 million copies sold.”<ref name="PRHGlobal2024" /> In the UK, trade outlet ''The Bookseller'' noted that ''Atomic Habits'' had appeared on ''The Sunday Times'' bestseller list 134 times since 2020.<ref name="BooksellerST2024">{{cite news |title=The Sunday Times names Stephen Hawking’s A Brief History of Time its top-ranked book of last 50 years |url=https://www.thebookseller.com/news/the-sunday-times-names-stephen-hawkings-a-brief-history-of-time-its-top-ranked-book-of-last-50-years |work=The Bookseller |date=16 August 2024 |access-date=3 November 2025}}</ref>