Jump to content

Home: Difference between revisions

From Insurer Brain
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(275 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--
<div style="float:right; width:100%; max-width:480px; box-sizing:border-box; margin:0 0 1em 2em; padding:.8em; border:1px solid #ddd; border-radius:8px; background:#f9f9f9;">
<div class="fullscreen-logo">
'''Quote of the day:'''
[[File:Logo of Insurer Brain.svg|frameless|center|link=]]
{{Quote of the day}}
</div>
</div>
-->
<!-- Force daily refresh: {{CURRENTYEAR}}-{{CURRENTMONTH}}-{{CURRENTDAY2}} -->
'''Did you know?'''

__NOCACHE__
== Skill-building book summaries ==
{{#switch: {{#expr: {{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} mod 100}}
''Looking to grow your skills? Start with our latest book summaries:''
| 0 = {{:Definition:Bordereaux}}

| 1 = {{:Definition:Burning cost}}
* 🌱 [[Tiny habits (2019) – BJ Fogg]]. Start absurdly small and celebrate to rewire behaviour.
| 2 = {{:Definition:Commutation (reinsurance)}}

| 3 = {{:Definition:Finite reinsurance}}
* ⚛️ [[Atomic habits (2018) – James Clear]]. Compound small improvements with clear systems.
| 4 = {{:Definition:Fronting}}

| 5 = {{:Definition:Follow-the-fortunes}}
* 💥[[The power of habit (2012) – Charles Duhigg]]. Use cue–routine–reward to change outcomes.
| 6 = {{:Definition:Cut-through clause}}

| 7 = {{:Definition:Binding authority}}
== Inspirational quotes ==
| 8 = {{:Definition:Clash cover}}
''Need a spark of inspiration to lift your day or shift your perspective? Explore our latest collection of quotes:''
| 9 = {{:Definition:Attachment point}}

| 10 = {{:Definition:Exhaustion point}}
* ✨ [[Quotes about the meaning of life]]
| 11 = {{:Definition:Reinstatement premium}}
| 12 = {{:Definition:Sliding-scale commission}}
| 13 = {{:Definition:Profit commission}}
| 14 = {{:Definition:Loss portfolio transfer}}
| 15 = {{:Definition:Adverse development cover (ADC)}}
| 16 = {{:Definition:Aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance}}
| 17 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe excess-of-loss reinsurance}}
| 18 = {{:Definition:Per-risk excess of loss reinsurance}}
| 19 = {{:Definition:Risks-attaching basis}}
| 20 = {{:Definition:Losses-occurring basis}}
| 21 = {{:Definition:Claims-made trigger}}
| 22 = {{:Definition:Signing down}}
| 23 = {{:Definition:Sunset clause}}
| 24 = {{:Definition:Utmost good faith}}
| 25 = {{:Definition:Contra proferentem}}
| 26 = {{:Definition:Incurred but not reported (IBNR)}}
| 27 = {{:Definition:Bornhuetter-Ferguson method}}
| 28 = {{:Definition:Chain-ladder method}}
| 29 = {{:Definition:Stochastic reserving}}
| 30 = {{:Definition:Loss development triangle}}
| 31 = {{:Definition:Credibility factor}}
| 32 = {{:Definition:Allocated loss adjustment expense (ALAE)}}
| 33 = {{:Definition:Unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE)}}
| 34 = {{:Definition:Experience modification factor}}
| 35 = {{:Definition:Industry loss warranty (ILW)}}
| 36 = {{:Definition:Sidecar (reinsurance)}}
| 37 = {{:Definition:Collateralized reinsurance}}
| 38 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe bond (CAT bond)}}
| 39 = {{:Definition:Retrocession}}
| 40 = {{:Definition:Surplus share reinsurance}}
| 41 = {{:Definition:Surplus strain}}
| 42 = {{:Definition:Surplus relief}}
| 43 = {{:Definition:Funds withheld reinsurance}}
| 44 = {{:Definition:Modified coinsurance}}
| 45 = {{:Definition:Coinsurance penalty}}
| 46 = {{:Definition:Anti-concurrent causation clause}}
| 47 = {{:Definition:Continuous trigger}}
| 48 = {{:Definition:Efficient proximate cause}}
| 49 = {{:Definition:Horizontal exhaustion}}
| 50 = {{:Definition:Vertical exhaustion}}
| 51 = {{:Definition:Sue and labor clause}}
| 52 = {{:Definition:Honorable engagement clause}}
| 53 = {{:Definition:Hours clause}}
| 54 = {{:Definition:Batch clause}}
| 55 = {{:Definition:Aggregation clause}}
| 56 = {{:Definition:Omnibus clause}}
| 57 = {{:Definition:Running down clause}}
| 58 = {{:Definition:Warehouse-to-warehouse clause}}
| 59 = {{:Definition:General average}}
| 60 = {{:Definition:Particular average}}
| 61 = {{:Definition:Constructive total loss}}
| 62 = {{:Definition:York-Antwerp Rules}}
| 63 = {{:Definition:Protection and indemnity (P&I)}}
| 64 = {{:Definition:Demand surge}}
| 65 = {{:Definition:Social inflation}}
| 66 = {{:Definition:Nuclear verdict}}
| 67 = {{:Definition:Silent cyber}}
| 68 = {{:Definition:Affirmative cyber coverage}}
| 69 = {{:Definition:Parametric insurance}}
| 70 = {{:Definition:Embedded insurance}}
| 71 = {{:Definition:Takaful}}
| 72 = {{:Definition:Bancassurance}}
| 73 = {{:Definition:Microinsurance}}
| 74 = {{:Definition:Captive insurance company}}
| 75 = {{:Definition:Cell captive}}
| 76 = {{:Definition:Protected cell company (PCC)}}
| 77 = {{:Definition:Reciprocal insurance exchange}}
| 78 = {{:Definition:Risk retention group (RRG)}}
| 79 = {{:Definition:Lloyd's syndicate}}
| 80 = {{:Definition:Reinsurance to close (RITC)}}
| 81 = {{:Definition:Equitas}}
| 82 = {{:Definition:Funds at Lloyd's (FAL)}}
| 83 = {{:Definition:Syndicate-in-a-box (SIAB)}}
| 84 = {{:Definition:Part VII transfer}}
| 85 = {{:Definition:Solvent scheme of arrangement}}
| 86 = {{:Definition:Run-off (insurance)}}
| 87 = {{:Definition:Demutualization}}
| 88 = {{:Definition:Depopulation program}}
| 89 = {{:Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML)}}
| 90 = {{:Definition:Exceedance probability curve (EP curve)}}
| 91 = {{:Definition:Realistic disaster scenario (RDS)}}
| 92 = {{:Definition:Monte Carlo simulation}}
| 93 = {{:Definition:Copula}}
| 94 = {{:Definition:Bühlmann model}}
| 95 = {{:Definition:Cape Cod method}}
| 96 = {{:Definition:Extra-contractual obligation (ECO)}}
| 97 = {{:Definition:Loss in excess of policy limits (XPL)}}
| 98 = {{:Definition:Doctrine of reasonable expectations}}
| 99 = {{:Definition:Longevity swap}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:46, 12 March 2026

Did you know?

📋 Follow-the-fortunes is a reinsurance principle requiring the reinsurer to honor the ceding company's reasonable and good-faith decisions on claims falling within the reinsured business. Often embedded explicitly in treaty language or implied by custom, this doctrine ensures that the reinsurer's obligation to indemnify tracks the actual loss experience of the ceding insurer, rather than allowing the reinsurer to re-adjudicate individual claims at its own discretion. The hyphenated form "follow-the-fortunes" and the unhyphenated "follow the fortunes" are used interchangeably across the industry, though some legal commentators distinguish the phrase from the related " follow the settlements" doctrine based on whether the focus is on the cedent's overall underwriting fate or specific payment decisions.

⚙️ The mechanism is straightforward: once the ceding insurer pays a claim that was made honestly, fell within the terms of the original policy, and reasonably related to the risks covered by the reinsurance, the reinsurer must pay its proportionate or excess share. The reinsurer cannot refuse simply because it would have denied the claim or negotiated a lower settlement. Courts typically require the cedent to demonstrate three elements — good faith, reasonable claims handling, and a loss allocation that falls within the reinsured subject matter. Challenges tend to arise when losses span multiple policy periods or when the cedent settles claims involving partially covered and partially excluded perils, forcing a discussion about whether the allocation methodology itself was reasonable.

💡 This principle underpins the commercial viability of reinsurance as a risk transfer tool. If reinsurers could routinely refuse to follow the cedent's claims outcomes, primary insurers would face unpredictable recovery on their reinsurance assets, destabilizing their reserves and solvency positions. From a market perspective, follow-the-fortunes encourages underwriters on both sides of the transaction to focus their due diligence on the front end — at the point of underwriting and treaty negotiation — rather than litigating every claim on the back end. It remains one of the most frequently invoked doctrines in reinsurance arbitration proceedings worldwide.

Related concepts