Insurer Brain

Internal:Training/IFRS17/Discounting: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Created page with "{{Internal:Training/IFRS17/nav-dropdown}} 🔗 '''Recall.''' In the previous page, you learned how fulfilment cash flows are estimated: the insurer identifies every future cash inflow and outflow within the contract boundary, weights them by probability, and keeps the assumptions current. Now we build on that by exploring why those future cash flows cannot simply be added up at face value, and how dis..."
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 22:
== Choosing the discount rate: top-down vs. bottom-up ==
 
🎯 '''The rate matters enormously.''' The [[Definition:Discount rate|discount rate]] is not a minor technical detail; it is one of the most influential assumptions in the entire [[Definition:IFRS 17|IFRS 17]] measurement. A small change in the rate can shift the reported liability by millions.thousands To— illustrateor, takeacross a portfolio, ofby [[Definition:Annuity|annuity]]millions. contractsReturn into Italythe whereAXA example: the insurer expects to pay €50a millionsingle in[[Definition:Claim|claim]] claimsof over€100,000 the nextin 20five years. At a discount rate of 23%, the [[Definition:Present value|present value]] ofis those€86,261 paymentsas mightwe besaw €38 millionabove. AtBut 3if the rate were only 2%, itthe dropspresent tovalue roughlywould €33rise million.to Thatapproximately €5€90,574 million— a difference, drivenof bymore than €4,300 from a single percentage point. Across hundreds of similar policies the effect multiplies rapidly, flowsflowing straight through to the [[Definition:Balance sheet|balance sheet]] and the [[Definition:Income statement|income statement]]. Because the stakes are so high, IFRS 17 does not prescribe a single rate. Instead, it sets out principles and allows insurers to arrive at an appropriate rate through one of two approaches.
 
🔼 '''The bottom-up approach.''' The first method starts with a [[Definition:Risk-free rate|risk-free rate]], typically derived from [[Definition:Government bonds|government bond]] yields in the currency of the [[Definition:Insurance contract|insurance contract]]. In the eurozone, this would begin with yields on high-quality government securities such as German or French sovereign bonds. The insurer then adds an [[Definition:Illiquidity premium|illiquidity premium]] to reflect the fact that insurance liabilities are not traded on an open market and the insurer is not forced to liquidate assets at short notice. The logic is straightforward: because the insurer holds assets that earn a return above the risk-free rate due to their [[Definition:Illiquidity|illiquidity]], the discount rate should capture that additional return. The bottom-up approach is intuitive and transparent, but estimating the illiquidity premium requires judgment, and different insurers may arrive at different figures.
Line 35:
== How discounting affects the liability over time ==
 
⏳ '''The unwinding of discount.''' ImagineTwo thatyears onhave 1now January,passed ansince insurerAXA inwrote Spainthe recordspolicy. aThe [[Definition:Present valueClaim|present valueclaim]] liabilityis ofstill €92expected to cost €100,000, forand athe [[Definition:ClaimDiscount rate|claimdiscount rate]] expectedremains toat cost3 €100%,000 inbut threethe years,payment usingis anow discountthree rateyears away instead of 2.8%five. OneThe year[[Definition:Present passesvalue|present withoutvalue]] anyof changethe inliability estimates:has therisen claimfrom isthe stilloriginal expected€86,261 to beapproximately €100,000€91,514 and— thenot discountbecause rateanything haswent notwrong, moved.but Yetsimply because the liability on 31 Decembermoney is noneeded longer €92,000sooner. ItOne hasyear grown to approximately €94,576later, simplywith becausetwo theyears paymentremaining, isit nowclimbs twoagain yearsto awayroughly instead of three€94,260. This automatic increase is called the [[Definition:Unwinding of discount|unwinding of discount]], sometimes referred to as the [[Definition:Accretion of interest|accretion of interest]]. It represents the cost of being one year closer to having to pay the money. Think of it like a countdown timer: the closer you get to the deadline, the more cash you need on hand, even though the final amount has not changed.
 
<div data-wix-module="discount-rate">Loading…</div>
 
📊 '''Where it appears in the financial statements.''' Under IFRS 17, the unwinding of discount does not flow through the [[Definition:Insurance service result|insurance service result]] on the income statement. Instead, it is reported as part of [[Definition:Insurance finance income or expense|insurance finance income or expense]], a separate line that captures the effect of the time value of money and changes in [[Definition:Financial risk|financial risk]] on the insurance liability. This separation is deliberate. The insurance service result shows how well the insurer is performing on its core underwriting activity: collecting premiums, paying claims, and managing expenses. The finance line captures the purely financial effects, the cost of time and the impact of shifting [[Definition:Interest rates|interest rates]], that have nothing to do with service delivery. By splitting these two effects, IFRS 17 gives readers of the financial statements a much clearer picture of what is driving changes in the insurer's profitability.
Retrieved from "https://www.insurerbrain.com/wiki/Internal:Training/IFRS17/Discounting"