Jump to content

Test: Difference between revisions

From Insurer Brain
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<syntaxhighlight lang="yaml">
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right"
topic: Global insurance markets
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance Group — Property & Casualty: Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA) (USD mm), FY24–FY25
year: 2024
|-
source: Activity report - Full Year 2024
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue¹ || 8,989.2 || 9,661.8 || 18,651.0 || 9,801.1 || 10,851.2 || 20,652.3
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: losses, gross || (5,364.2) || (6,575.9) || (11,940.1) || (5,505.9) || (6,583.3) || (12,089.2)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: expenses, gross || (2,159.4) || (2,326.6) || (4,486.1) || (2,370.5) || (2,709.7) || (5,080.2)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net exp. from reinsurance contracts held¹ || (749.1) || (156.3) || (905.3) || (952.1) || (641.9) || (1,594.0)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Insurance service result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''716.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''603.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,319.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''972.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''916.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,888.8'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 443.8 || 464.1 || 907.8 || 498.4 || 523.1 || 1,021.5
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 53.3 || 26.1 || 79.4 || (6.8) || 48.6 || 41.8
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''497.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''490.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''987.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''491.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''571.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,063.3'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (184.2) || (195.4) || (379.5) || (209.7) || (225.7) || (435.4)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net investment result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''312.9''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''294.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''607.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''281.9''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''346.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''627.9'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 109.3 || 112.9 || 222.2 || 115.2 || 120.9 || 236.1
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (83.3) || (86.9) || (170.2) || (85.8) || (94.8) || (180.7)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Fee result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''26.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''26.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''52.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''29.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''26.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''55.4'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (263.1) || (202.6) || (465.7) || (230.3) || (271.2) || (501.5)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which: tech. non-qualifying exp. || (259.0) || (216.2) || (475.2) || (222.3) || (261.6) || (483.9)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (exp.)/benefit attrib. to policyholders || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''BOP before NCI''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''792.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''721.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,513.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,053.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,017.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,070.7'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 11.6 || 14.5 || 26.0 || 14.6 || 13.7 || 28.3
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Business operating profit''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''780.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''706.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,487.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,038.9''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,003.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,042.4'''
|-
| colspan="7" style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eaecf0" | '''Ratios, as % of insurance revenue'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 68.0% || 69.7% || 68.9% || 65.9% || 66.6% || 66.3%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which catastrophes || 1.0% || 1.7% || 1.4% || 1.0% || 0.5% || 0.7%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which discount impact (curr. AY) || -3.2% || -2.8% || -3.0% || -2.6% || -2.5% || -2.6%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which PYD || -2.4% || -2.1% || -2.3% || -2.6% || -2.4% || -2.5%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio² || 26.9% || 26.3% || 26.6% || 26.5% || 27.4% || 26.9%
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Combined ratio''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''94.9%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''96.0%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''95.5%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''92.3%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''94.0%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''93.2%'''
|}


markets:
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right"
- region: France
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance Group — Property & Casualty: North America (USD mm), FY24–FY25
segments:
|-
- name: Savings insurance
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25
performance:
|-
premium_growth_yoy: +14%
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue¹ || 9,970.2 || 11,014.9 || 20,985.1 || 10,520.1 || 11,598.8 || 22,118.9
total_premiums_eur_bn: 173
|-
sub_products:
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: losses, gross || (5,576.8) || (7,303.9) || (12,880.6) || (5,516.0) || (6,917.3) || (12,433.3)
- name: Unit-linked
|-
growth_yoy: +8%
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: expenses, gross || (2,396.8) || (2,608.7) || (5,005.5) || (2,827.3) || (2,983.7) || (5,811.1)
share_of_total: 38% # down from 40% in 2023
|-
- name: General Account
| style="text-align:left" | Net exp. from reinsurance contracts held¹ || (1,084.8) || (336.3) || (1,421.1) || (1,199.9) || (638.0) || (1,837.9)
growth_yoy: +17%
|-
notes:
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Insurance service result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''911.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''766.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,677.9''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''976.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,059.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,036.6'''
- Saving ratio increased amid economic, fiscal, and political uncertainty.
|-
- Stagnant real estate market supported net flows into Life insurance.
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 563.9 || 576.9 || 1,140.8 || 577.8 || 611.2 || 1,189.0
- Surrenders decreased in General Account funds despite Livret A rate held at 3%.
|-
- Surrenders increased in Unit-linked products, partially offsetting the GA decrease.
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 88.2 || 105.5 || 193.7 || 38.9 || 133.6 || 172.4
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''652.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''682.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,334.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''616.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''744.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,361.4'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (321.0) || (369.3) || (690.3) || (370.7) || (376.3) || (747.0)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net investment result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''331.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''313.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''644.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''246.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''368.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''614.4'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 104.0 || 101.9 || 206.0 || 133.2 || 116.4 || 249.6
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (64.8) || (69.5) || (134.3) || (104.2) || (78.1) || (182.3)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Fee result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''39.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''32.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''71.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''29.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''38.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''67.3'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (45.9) || (34.5) || (80.5) || (47.5) || (17.1) || (64.6)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which: tech. non-qualifying exp. || (87.3) || (77.6) || (164.8) || (100.7) || (77.5) || (178.2)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (exp.)/benefit attrib. to policyholders || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''BOP before NCI''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,236.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,077.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,313.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,204.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,449.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,653.7'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Business operating profit''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,236.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,077.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,313.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,204.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,449.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,653.7'''
|-
| colspan="7" style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eaecf0" | '''Ratios, as % of insurance revenue'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 66.8% || 69.4% || 68.2% || 63.8% || 65.1% || 64.5%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which catastrophes || 3.5% || 5.4% || 4.5% || 2.9% || 0.6% || 1.7%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which discount impact (curr. AY) || -4.9% || -3.9% || -4.4% || -4.5% || -3.8% || -4.2%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which PYD || -1.0% || -1.0% || -1.0% || -1.3% || -0.5% || -0.9%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio² || 24.9% || 24.4% || 24.6% || 27.8% || 26.4% || 27.1%
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Combined ratio''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''91.7%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''93.7%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''92.8%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''91.7%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''91.5%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''91.6%'''
|}


- name: Protection and Complementary Health insurance
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right"
notes:
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance Group — Property & Casualty: Asia Pacific (USD mm), FY24–FY25
- Medical inflation partly absorbed via average tariff increase of 8% in 2024.
|-
- Cost and frequency of claims both rose.
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25
- Political uncertainty around the Sécurité Sociale budget may drive further tariff increases as state reimbursement share decreases.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue¹ || 1,746.3 || 2,046.8 || 3,793.0 || 2,004.4 || 2,102.8 || 4,107.2
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: losses, gross || (815.3) || (959.7) || (1,775.1) || (984.3) || (1,159.0) || (2,143.3)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: expenses, gross || (534.9) || (617.1) || (1,152.0) || (604.9) || (620.5) || (1,225.5)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net exp. from reinsurance contracts held¹ || (231.1) || (259.7) || (490.8) || (225.8) || (153.2) || (379.0)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Insurance service result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''164.9''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''210.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''375.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''189.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''170.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''359.4'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 75.4 || 104.4 || 179.8 || 99.8 || 107.1 || 206.9
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || (2.0) || 0.6 || (1.3) || 0.1 || (3.3) || (3.2)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''73.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''105.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''178.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''99.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''103.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''203.6'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (27.0) || (31.7) || (58.8) || (32.0) || (33.0) || (65.0)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net investment result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''46.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''73.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''119.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''67.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''70.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''138.6'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 29.9 || 25.0 || 54.9 || 18.6 || 26.0 || 44.6
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (37.2) || (42.0) || (79.3) || (36.4) || (47.1) || (83.5)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Fee result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(7.3)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(17.0)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(24.3)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(17.8)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(21.1)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(38.9)'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (55.1) || (61.3) || (116.3) || (60.2) || (56.4) || (116.6)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which: tech. non-qualifying exp. || (55.3) || (51.6) || (106.8) || (61.3) || (65.0) || (126.2)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (exp.)/benefit attrib. to policyholders || (2.0) || (2.8) || (4.8) || (0.4) || (1.7) || (2.2)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''BOP before NCI''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''146.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''202.6''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''349.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''178.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''161.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''340.4'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 1.5 || 4.9 || 6.4 || (1.3) || (4.6) || (5.9)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Business operating profit''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''145.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''197.6''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''343.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''180.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''166.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''346.3'''
|-
| colspan="7" style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eaecf0" | '''Ratios, as % of insurance revenue'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 59.9% || 59.6% || 59.7% || 60.4% || 62.4% || 61.4%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which catastrophes || 0.2% || 0.0% || 0.1% || 0.5% || 0.3% || 0.4%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which discount impact (curr. AY) || -1.5% || -1.5% || -1.5% || -1.5% || -1.6% || -1.6%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which PYD || -3.2% || -1.2% || -2.2% || -4.2% || -2.1% || -3.2%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio² || 33.8% || 32.7% || 33.2% || 33.2% || 32.6% || 32.9%
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Combined ratio''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''93.7%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''92.2%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''92.9%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''93.6%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''95.0%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''94.3%'''
|}


- name: Property & Casualty
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right"
notes:
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance Group — Property & Casualty: Latin America (USD mm), FY24–FY25
- Motor claims rose due to driver behavior and higher repair costs.
|-
natural_catastrophes:
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25
- event: Cyclone Belal (overseas)
|-
estimated_cost_eur_bn: 0.1
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue¹ || 1,573.3 || 1,588.7 || 3,161.9 || 1,566.5 || 1,679.0 || 3,245.5
- event: Cyclone Chido (overseas)
|-
estimated_cost_eur_bn_range: [0.65, 0.8]
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: losses, gross || (630.3) || (475.1) || (1,105.4) || (540.2) || (580.2) || (1,120.4)
- event: Floods (including Kirk depression)
|-
estimated_cost_eur_bn_range: [0.35, 0.42]
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: expenses, gross || (617.6) || (622.1) || (1,239.7) || (604.8) || (674.2) || (1,278.9)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net exp. from reinsurance contracts held¹ || (196.7) || (337.8) || (534.5) || (232.9) || (261.0) || (493.9)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Insurance service result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''128.6''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''153.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''282.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''188.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''163.6''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''352.2'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 148.9 || 121.7 || 270.6 || 103.2 || 103.8 || 207.0
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 11.9 || (17.1) || (5.2) || 2.0 || (2.3) || (0.3)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''160.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''104.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''265.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''105.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''101.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''206.7'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (45.3) || (32.8) || (78.1) || (31.3) || (26.4) || (57.7)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net investment result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''115.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''71.9''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''187.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''73.9''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''75.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''149.0'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || 0.1 || (0.2) || (0.1) || (1.0) || (0.6) || (1.6)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Fee result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(0.2)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(0.1)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(1.0)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(0.6)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(1.6)'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (64.4) || (66.1) || (130.5) || (73.1) || (72.8) || (145.9)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which: tech. non-qualifying exp. || (61.9) || (67.0) || (128.9) || (71.7) || (71.6) || (143.3)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (exp.)/benefit attrib. to policyholders || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''BOP before NCI''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''179.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''159.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''339.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''188.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''165.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''353.7'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 58.3 || 58.2 || 116.4 || 64.7 || 70.2 || 134.8
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Business operating profit''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''121.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''101.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''222.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''123.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''95.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''218.9'''
|-
| colspan="7" style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eaecf0" | '''Ratios, as % of insurance revenue'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 52.6% || 51.2% || 51.9% || 49.4% || 50.1% || 49.7%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which catastrophes || 0.6% || -0.0% || 0.3% || 0.0% || 0.0% || 0.0%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which discount impact (curr. AY) || -1.9% || -1.4% || -1.7% || -1.6% || -1.1% || -1.3%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which PYD || 0.1% || -0.1% || -0.0% || -2.0% || -0.0% || -1.0%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio² || 43.2% || 43.4% || 43.3% || 43.2% || 44.4% || 43.8%
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Combined ratio''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''95.8%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''94.5%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''95.1%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''92.5%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''94.5%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''93.6%'''
|}


- region: Europe (excluding France)
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right"
segments:
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance Group — Property & Casualty: Group Reinsurance (USD mm), FY24–FY25
- name: Property & Casualty
|-
notes:
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25
- Faced rising repair costs amid persistent but moderating inflation.
|-
- Evolving risks including climate change.
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue¹ || 398.3 || 400.2 || 798.5 || 413.6 || 416.9 || 830.5
- Multiple but less severe weather events, mainly hailstorms and floods across most geographies.
|-
- Insurers responding via pricing measures, product reshaping, and updated risk management practices.
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: losses, gross || (208.0) || (415.1) || (623.1) || (197.7) || (213.3) || (411.1)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: expenses, gross || (11.3) || (17.7) || (28.9) || (19.8) || (16.0) || (35.8)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net exp. from reinsurance contracts held¹ || (237.8) || (63.1) || (300.9) || (296.7) || (179.3) || (476.0)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Insurance service result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(58.7)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(95.7)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(154.4)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(100.7)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''8.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(92.4)'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 1.2 || 2.7 || 3.9 || (3.2) || 14.2 || 11.0
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 1.0 || 1.8 || 2.8 || 1.8 || (1.8) || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''4.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''6.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(1.3)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''12.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''11.0'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (10.8) || (15.7) || (26.5) || (15.1) || (17.3) || (32.3)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net investment result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(8.5)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(11.3)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(19.8)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(16.4)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(4.9)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(21.3)'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Fee result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || 7.6 || 4.6 || 12.3 || (0.8) || (18.1) || (18.9)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which: tech. non-qualifying exp. || (20.6) || (24.2) || (44.9) || (22.8) || (42.1) || (64.8)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (exp.)/benefit attrib. to policyholders || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''BOP before NCI''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(59.6)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(102.4)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(162.0)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(117.9)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(14.7)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(132.7)'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Business operating profit''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(59.6)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(102.4)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(162.0)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(117.9)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(14.7)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(132.7)'''
|-
| colspan="7" style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eaecf0" | '''Ratios, as % of insurance revenue'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which catastrophes || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which discount impact (curr. AY) || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which PYD || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio² || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Combined ratio''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.'''
|}


- name: Life and Savings
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right"
notes:
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance Group — Property & Casualty: Eliminations (USD mm), FY24–FY25
- Recovering from last year's challenging macroeconomic environment.
|-
- Still affected by modest growth and economic/political uncertainties.
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue¹ || (1,231.6) || (1,366.5) || (2,598.1) || (1,291.6) || (1,429.1) || (2,720.7)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: losses, gross || 486.9 || 1,271.5 || 1,758.4 || 360.3 || 635.3 || 995.6
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: expenses, gross || (1.8) || 1.1 || (0.7) || (4.6) || (4.6) || (9.2)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net exp. from reinsurance contracts held¹ || 746.5 || 93.9 || 840.4 || 935.9 || 798.4 || 1,734.3
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Insurance service result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || 0.1 || 0.0 || 0.1 || 0.0 || (0.4) || (0.4)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net investment result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(0.4)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(0.3)'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (0.6) || (1.0) || (1.6) || 0.5 || 0.0 || 0.5
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Fee result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(0.6)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(1.0)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''(1.6)''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.5'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || 0.5 || 1.0 || 1.5 || (0.6) || 0.4 || (0.2)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which: tech. non-qualifying exp. || 0.5 || 1.0 || 1.5 || (0.5) || 0.0 || (0.6)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (exp.)/benefit attrib. to policyholders || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''BOP before NCI''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0 || 0.0
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Business operating profit''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''0.0'''
|-
| colspan="7" style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eaecf0" | '''Ratios, as % of insurance revenue'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which catastrophes || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which discount impact (curr. AY) || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which PYD || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio² || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m.
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Combined ratio''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''n.m.'''
|}


- name: Health
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right"
notes:
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance Group — Property & Casualty: Total (USD mm), FY24–FY25
- Private insurers facing ageing population, claims cost inflation, and strains on national healthcare systems.
|-
- Implementing progressive price increases.
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25
- Focusing on digital transformation, including care pathway management and wellness benefits.
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue¹ || 21,445.7 || 23,345.8 || 44,791.5 || 23,014.1 || 25,219.5 || 48,233.6
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: losses, gross || (12,107.8) || (14,458.2) || (26,566.0) || (12,383.9) || (14,817.7) || (27,201.6)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service exp.: expenses, gross || (5,721.8) || (6,191.1) || (11,912.9) || (6,431.9) || (7,008.7) || (13,440.7)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net exp. from reinsurance contracts held¹ || (1,753.0) || (1,059.2) || (2,812.2) || (1,971.6) || (1,075.0) || (3,046.6)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Insurance service result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,863.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,637.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''3,500.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,226.6''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,318.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''4,544.7'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 1,233.2 || 1,269.8 || 2,503.0 || 1,276.0 || 1,359.4 || 2,635.4
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 152.5 || 116.9 || 269.4 || 35.9 || 174.7 || 210.7
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,385.6''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,386.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,772.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,311.9''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,534.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,846.1'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (588.2) || (644.9) || (1,233.2) || (658.8) || (679.0) || (1,337.8)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Net investment result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''797.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''741.9''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,539.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''653.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''855.1''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,508.2'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 243.3 || 239.9 || 483.2 || 267.0 || 263.3 || 530.3
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (185.8) || (199.6) || (385.4) || (226.8) || (220.7) || (447.5)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Fee result''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''57.4''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''40.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''97.7''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''40.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''42.6''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''82.8'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (420.3) || (358.9) || (779.2) || (412.6) || (435.2) || (847.7)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which: tech. non-qualifying exp. || (483.6) || (435.6) || (919.2) || (479.2) || (517.8) || (997.0)
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (exp.)/benefit attrib. to policyholders || (2.0) || (2.8) || (4.8) || (0.4) || (1.7) || (2.2)
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''BOP before NCI''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,295.6''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,057.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''4,353.3''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,507.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,778.8''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''5,285.8'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 71.4 || 77.5 || 148.9 || 77.9 || 79.2 || 157.2
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Business operating profit''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,224.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''1,980.2''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''4,204.5''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,429.0''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''2,699.6''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''5,128.6'''
|-
| colspan="7" style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eaecf0" | '''Ratios, as % of insurance revenue'''
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 64.6% || 66.5% || 65.6% || 62.4% || 63.0% || 62.7%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which catastrophes || 2.4% || 3.7% || 3.1% || 1.8% || 0.6% || 1.2%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which discount impact (curr. AY) || -4.0% || -3.2% || -3.6% || -3.5% || -3.1% || -3.3%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of which PYD || -1.6% || -1.5% || -1.6% || -1.8% || -1.7% || -1.8%
|-
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio² || 28.9% || 28.4% || 28.6% || 30.0% || 29.8% || 29.9%
|-
| style="text-align:left; border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''Combined ratio''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''93.6%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''94.9%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''94.2%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''92.4%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''92.9%''' || style="border-top:1px solid #a2a9b1; background:#eef1f5" | '''92.6%'''
|}


- region: Japan
<small>¹ Includes add-back and international programs business.</small><br>
segments:
<small>² Includes insurance service expenses reported in the insurance service result, as well as technical non-qualifying expenses reported in the other result.</small>
- name: Life insurance
performance:
gwp_growth_yoy: +5%
notes:
- Growth driven by strong sales of traditional General Account Savings products.
- Higher guarantees offered as a result of rising Japanese interest rates.
- Major insurers' net income boosted by favorable Japanese equity market performance.

- name: Property & Casualty
performance:
gwp_growth_yoy: +3%
notes:
- Driven by price increases in Motor and Fire insurance.

- region: Hong Kong
segments:
- name: Life insurance
performance:
gwp_growth_yoy: +8%
new_business_growth_yoy: +16%
notes:
- New business growth derived from non-Linked individual business.
- Mainland China Visitors new business slightly decreased vs. 2023.
- Mainland China Visitors represented 28% of total Individual business.

- name: Property & Casualty
notes:
- Market remained stable.

- region: United States
segments:
- name: Property insurance
notes:
- Rates rose, though at a slower pace than prior years.
- Strict underwriting across capacity deployment, risk selection, and terms and conditions.
- Adversely impacted by increased frequency of Nat Cat events, particularly secondary perils.
- Rising reinsurance costs and economic inflation drove up construction costs.

- name: Casualty insurance
notes:
- Continues to experience rate increases due to loss trends.
- Elevated casualty claims from social inflation have impacted underwriting margins and reserves.

- region: Global
segments:
- name: Reinsurance
notes:
- Market remains well-capitalized; companies successfully raised capital to support growth.
- Property reinsurance saw increased rates and attachment points, improving margins.
- Realignment of property catastrophe risk allowed reinsurers to limit losses despite active weather patterns.
- Strong underwriting performance and improved investment returns helped mitigate adverse prior-year reserve development in US casualty business.
</syntaxhighlight>

Latest revision as of 16:48, 27 April 2026

topic: Global insurance markets
year: 2024
source: Activity report - Full Year 2024

markets:
  - region: France
    segments:
      - name: Savings insurance
        performance:
          premium_growth_yoy: +14%
          total_premiums_eur_bn: 173
        sub_products:
          - name: Unit-linked
            growth_yoy: +8%
            share_of_total: 38%       # down from 40% in 2023
          - name: General Account
            growth_yoy: +17%
        notes:
          - Saving ratio increased amid economic, fiscal, and political uncertainty.
          - Stagnant real estate market supported net flows into Life insurance.
          - Surrenders decreased in General Account funds despite Livret A rate held at 3%.
          - Surrenders increased in Unit-linked products, partially offsetting the GA decrease.

      - name: Protection and Complementary Health insurance
        notes:
          - Medical inflation partly absorbed via average tariff increase of 8% in 2024.
          - Cost and frequency of claims both rose.
          - Political uncertainty around the Sécurité Sociale budget may drive further tariff increases as state reimbursement share decreases.

      - name: Property & Casualty
        notes:
          - Motor claims rose due to driver behavior and higher repair costs.
        natural_catastrophes:
          - event: Cyclone Belal (overseas)
            estimated_cost_eur_bn: 0.1
          - event: Cyclone Chido (overseas)
            estimated_cost_eur_bn_range: [0.65, 0.8]
          - event: Floods (including Kirk depression)
            estimated_cost_eur_bn_range: [0.35, 0.42]

  - region: Europe (excluding France)
    segments:
      - name: Property & Casualty
        notes:
          - Faced rising repair costs amid persistent but moderating inflation.
          - Evolving risks including climate change.
          - Multiple but less severe weather events, mainly hailstorms and floods across most geographies.
          - Insurers responding via pricing measures, product reshaping, and updated risk management practices.

      - name: Life and Savings
        notes:
          - Recovering from last year's challenging macroeconomic environment.
          - Still affected by modest growth and economic/political uncertainties.

      - name: Health
        notes:
          - Private insurers facing ageing population, claims cost inflation, and strains on national healthcare systems.
          - Implementing progressive price increases.
          - Focusing on digital transformation, including care pathway management and wellness benefits.

  - region: Japan
    segments:
      - name: Life insurance
        performance:
          gwp_growth_yoy: +5%
        notes:
          - Growth driven by strong sales of traditional General Account Savings products.
          - Higher guarantees offered as a result of rising Japanese interest rates.
          - Major insurers' net income boosted by favorable Japanese equity market performance.

      - name: Property & Casualty
        performance:
          gwp_growth_yoy: +3%
        notes:
          - Driven by price increases in Motor and Fire insurance.

  - region: Hong Kong
    segments:
      - name: Life insurance
        performance:
          gwp_growth_yoy: +8%
          new_business_growth_yoy: +16%
        notes:
          - New business growth derived from non-Linked individual business.
          - Mainland China Visitors new business slightly decreased vs. 2023.
          - Mainland China Visitors represented 28% of total Individual business.

      - name: Property & Casualty
        notes:
          - Market remained stable.

  - region: United States
    segments:
      - name: Property insurance
        notes:
          - Rates rose, though at a slower pace than prior years.
          - Strict underwriting across capacity deployment, risk selection, and terms and conditions.
          - Adversely impacted by increased frequency of Nat Cat events, particularly secondary perils.
          - Rising reinsurance costs and economic inflation drove up construction costs.

      - name: Casualty insurance
        notes:
          - Continues to experience rate increases due to loss trends.
          - Elevated casualty claims from social inflation have impacted underwriting margins and reserves.

  - region: Global
    segments:
      - name: Reinsurance
        notes:
          - Market remains well-capitalized; companies successfully raised capital to support growth.
          - Property reinsurance saw increased rates and attachment points, improving margins.
          - Realignment of property catastrophe risk allowed reinsurers to limit losses despite active weather patterns.
          - Strong underwriting performance and improved investment returns helped mitigate adverse prior-year reserve development in US casualty business.