Test: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<syntaxhighlight lang="yaml"> |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right" |
|||
topic: Global insurance markets |
|||
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance — P&C Europe, Middle East & Africa, Overview (USD mm) and Ratios, FY24–FY25 |
|||
year: 2024 |
|||
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | FY25 |
|||
source: Activity report - Full Year 2024 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue<sup>1</sup> || 8,989 || 9,662 || 18,651 || 9,801 || 10,851 || 20,652 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: losses, gross || (5,364) || (6,576) || (11,940) || (5,506) || (6,583) || (12,089) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: expenses, gross || (2,159) || (2,327) || (4,486) || (2,371) || (2,710) || (5,080) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net expenses from reins. contracts held<sup>1</sup> || (749) || (156) || (905) || (952) || (642) || (1,594) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Insurance service result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''716''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''603''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,320''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''973''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''916''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,889''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 444 || 464 || 908 || 498 || 523 || 1,021 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 53 || 26 || 79 || (7) || 49 || 42 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''497''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''490''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''987''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''492''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''572''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,063''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (184) || (195) || (380) || (210) || (226) || (435) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''313''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''295''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''608''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''282''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''346''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''628''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 109 || 113 || 222 || 115 || 121 || 236 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (83) || (87) || (170) || (86) || (95) || (181) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Fee result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''26''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''26''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''52''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''29''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''26''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''55''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (263) || (203) || (466) || (230) || (271) || (501) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: tech. non-qualifying expense || (259) || (216) || (475) || (222) || (262) || (484) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (expense)/benefit attr. to policyholders || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP before NCI''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''792''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''721''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,514''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,053''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,017''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,071''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 12 || 14 || 26 || 15 || 14 || 28 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''781''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''707''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,487''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,039''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,004''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,042''' |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan="7" style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | Ratios (% of insurance revenue) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 68.0% || 69.7% || 68.9% || 65.9% || 66.6% || 66.3% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: catastrophes || 1.0% || 1.7% || 1.4% || 1.0% || 0.5% || 0.7% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: discount impact (curr. AY) || -3.2% || -2.8% || -3.0% || -2.6% || -2.5% || -2.6% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: PYD || -2.4% || -2.1% || -2.3% || -2.6% || -2.4% || -2.5% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio<sup>2</sup> || 26.9% || 26.3% || 26.6% || 26.5% || 27.4% || 26.9% |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Combined ratio''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''94.9%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''96.0%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''95.5%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''92.3%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''94.0%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''93.2%''' |
|||
|} |
|||
markets: |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right" |
|||
- region: France |
|||
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance — P&C North America, Overview (USD mm) and Ratios, FY24–FY25 |
|||
segments: |
|||
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | FY25 |
|||
- name: Savings insurance |
|||
|- |
|||
performance: |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue<sup>1</sup> || 9,970 || 11,015 || 20,985 || 10,520 || 11,599 || 22,119 |
|||
premium_growth_yoy: +14% |
|||
|- |
|||
total_premiums_eur_bn: 173 |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: losses, gross || (5,577) || (7,304) || (12,881) || (5,516) || (6,917) || (12,433) |
|||
sub_products: |
|||
|- |
|||
- name: Unit-linked |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: expenses, gross || (2,397) || (2,609) || (5,005) || (2,827) || (2,984) || (5,811) |
|||
growth_yoy: +8% |
|||
|- |
|||
share_of_total: 38% # down from 40% in 2023 |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net expenses from reins. contracts held<sup>1</sup> || (1,085) || (336) || (1,421) || (1,200) || (638) || (1,838) |
|||
- name: General Account |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
growth_yoy: +17% |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Insurance service result''' |
|||
notes: |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''912''' |
|||
- Saving ratio increased amid economic, fiscal, and political uncertainty. |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''766''' |
|||
- Stagnant real estate market supported net flows into Life insurance. |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,678''' |
|||
- Surrenders decreased in General Account funds despite Livret A rate held at 3%. |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''977''' |
|||
- Surrenders increased in Unit-linked products, partially offsetting the GA decrease. |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,060''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,037''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 564 || 577 || 1,141 || 578 || 611 || 1,189 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 88 || 106 || 194 || 39 || 134 || 172 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''652''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''682''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,335''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''617''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''745''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,361''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (321) || (369) || (690) || (371) || (376) || (747) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''331''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''313''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''644''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''246''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''368''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''614''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 104 || 102 || 206 || 133 || 116 || 250 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (65) || (70) || (134) || (104) || (78) || (182) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Fee result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''39''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''32''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''72''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''29''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''38''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''67''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (46) || (35) || (80) || (48) || (17) || (65) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: tech. non-qualifying expense || (87) || (78) || (165) || (101) || (78) || (178) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (expense)/benefit attr. to policyholders || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP before NCI''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,236''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,077''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,313''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,204''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,449''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,654''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,236''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,077''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,313''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,204''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,449''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,654''' |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan="7" style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | Ratios (% of insurance revenue) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 66.8% || 69.4% || 68.2% || 63.8% || 65.1% || 64.5% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: catastrophes || 3.5% || 5.4% || 4.5% || 2.9% || 0.6% || 1.7% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: discount impact (curr. AY) || -4.9% || -3.9% || -4.4% || -4.5% || -3.8% || -4.2% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: PYD || -1.0% || -1.0% || -1.0% || -1.3% || -0.5% || -0.9% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio<sup>2</sup> || 24.9% || 24.4% || 24.6% || 27.8% || 26.4% || 27.1% |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Combined ratio''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''91.7%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''93.7%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''92.8%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''91.7%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''91.5%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''91.6%''' |
|||
|} |
|||
- name: Protection and Complementary Health insurance |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right" |
|||
notes: |
|||
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance — P&C Asia Pacific, Overview (USD mm) and Ratios, FY24–FY25 |
|||
- Medical inflation partly absorbed via average tariff increase of 8% in 2024. |
|||
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25 |
|||
- Cost and frequency of claims both rose. |
|||
|- |
|||
- Political uncertainty around the Sécurité Sociale budget may drive further tariff increases as state reimbursement share decreases. |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue<sup>1</sup> || 1,746 || 2,047 || 3,793 || 2,004 || 2,103 || 4,107 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: losses, gross || (815) || (960) || (1,775) || (984) || (1,159) || (2,143) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: expenses, gross || (535) || (617) || (1,152) || (605) || (621) || (1,225) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net expenses from reins. contracts held<sup>1</sup> || (231) || (260) || (491) || (226) || (153) || (379) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Insurance service result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''165''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''210''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''375''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''189''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''170''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''359''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 75 || 104 || 180 || 100 || 107 || 207 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || (2) || 1 || (1) || 0 || (3) || (3) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''73''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''105''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''178''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''100''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''104''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''204''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (27) || (32) || (59) || (32) || (33) || (65) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''46''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''73''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''120''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''68''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''71''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''139''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 30 || 25 || 55 || 19 || 26 || 45 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (37) || (42) || (79) || (36) || (47) || (83) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Fee result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(7)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(17)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(24)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(18)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(21)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(39)''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (55) || (61) || (116) || (60) || (56) || (117) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: tech. non-qualifying expense || (55) || (52) || (107) || (61) || (65) || (126) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (expense)/benefit attr. to policyholders || (2) || (3) || (5) || 0 || (2) || (2) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP before NCI''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''147''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''203''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''349''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''179''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''162''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''340''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 2 || 5 || 6 || (1) || (5) || (6) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''145''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''198''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''343''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''180''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''166''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''346''' |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan="7" style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | Ratios (% of insurance revenue) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 59.9% || 59.6% || 59.7% || 60.4% || 62.4% || 61.4% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: catastrophes || 0.2% || 0.0% || 0.1% || 0.5% || 0.3% || 0.4% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: discount impact (curr. AY) || -1.5% || -1.5% || -1.5% || -1.5% || -1.6% || -1.6% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: PYD || -3.2% || -1.2% || -2.2% || -4.2% || -2.1% || -3.2% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio<sup>2</sup> || 33.8% || 32.7% || 33.2% || 33.2% || 32.6% || 32.9% |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Combined ratio''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''93.7%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''92.2%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''92.9%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''93.6%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''95.0%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''94.3%''' |
|||
|} |
|||
- name: Property & Casualty |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right" |
|||
notes: |
|||
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance — P&C Latin America, Overview (USD mm) and Ratios, FY24–FY25 |
|||
- Motor claims rose due to driver behavior and higher repair costs. |
|||
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25 |
|||
natural_catastrophes: |
|||
|- |
|||
- event: Cyclone Belal (overseas) |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue<sup>1</sup> || 1,573 || 1,589 || 3,162 || 1,566 || 1,679 || 3,245 |
|||
estimated_cost_eur_bn: 0.1 |
|||
|- |
|||
- event: Cyclone Chido (overseas) |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: losses, gross || (630) || (475) || (1,105) || (540) || (580) || (1,120) |
|||
estimated_cost_eur_bn_range: [0.65, 0.8] |
|||
|- |
|||
- event: Floods (including Kirk depression) |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: expenses, gross || (618) || (622) || (1,240) || (605) || (674) || (1,279) |
|||
estimated_cost_eur_bn_range: [0.35, 0.42] |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net expenses from reins. contracts held<sup>1</sup> || (197) || (338) || (535) || (233) || (261) || (494) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Insurance service result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''129''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''154''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''282''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''189''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''164''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''352''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 149 || 122 || 271 || 103 || 104 || 207 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 12 || (17) || (5) || 2 || (2) || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''161''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''105''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''265''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''105''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''101''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''207''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (45) || (33) || (78) || (31) || (26) || (58) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''115''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''72''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''187''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''74''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''75''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''149''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || 0 || 0 || 0 || (1) || (1) || (2) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Fee result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(1)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(1)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(2)''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (64) || (66) || (130) || (73) || (73) || (146) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: tech. non-qualifying expense || (62) || (67) || (129) || (72) || (72) || (143) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (expense)/benefit attr. to policyholders || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP before NCI''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''180''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''159''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''339''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''188''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''165''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''354''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 58 || 58 || 116 || 65 || 70 || 135 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''122''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''101''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''223''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''124''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''95''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''219''' |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan="7" style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | Ratios (% of insurance revenue) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 52.6% || 51.2% || 51.9% || 49.4% || 50.1% || 49.7% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: catastrophes || 0.6% || -0.0% || 0.3% || 0.0% || 0.0% || 0.0% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: discount impact (curr. AY) || -1.9% || -1.4% || -1.7% || -1.6% || -1.1% || -1.3% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: PYD || 0.1% || -0.1% || -0.0% || -2.0% || -0.0% || -1.0% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio<sup>2</sup> || 43.2% || 43.4% || 43.3% || 43.2% || 44.4% || 43.8% |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Combined ratio''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''95.8%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''94.5%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''95.1%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''92.5%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''94.5%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''93.6%''' |
|||
|} |
|||
- region: Europe (excluding France) |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right" |
|||
segments: |
|||
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance — P&C Group Reinsurance, Overview (USD mm) and Ratios, FY24–FY25 |
|||
- name: Property & Casualty |
|||
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25 |
|||
notes: |
|||
|- |
|||
- Faced rising repair costs amid persistent but moderating inflation. |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue<sup>1</sup> || 398 || 400 || 799 || 414 || 417 || 831 |
|||
- Evolving risks including climate change. |
|||
|- |
|||
- Multiple but less severe weather events, mainly hailstorms and floods across most geographies. |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: losses, gross || (208) || (415) || (623) || (198) || (213) || (411) |
|||
- Insurers responding via pricing measures, product reshaping, and updated risk management practices. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: expenses, gross || (11) || (18) || (29) || (20) || (16) || (36) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net expenses from reins. contracts held<sup>1</sup> || (238) || (63) || (301) || (297) || (179) || (476) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Insurance service result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(59)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(96)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(154)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(101)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''8''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(92)''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 1 || 3 || 4 || (3) || 14 || 11 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 1 || 2 || 3 || 2 || (2) || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''4''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''7''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(1)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''12''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''11''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (11) || (16) || (27) || (15) || (17) || (32) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(9)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(11)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(20)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(16)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(5)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(21)''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Fee result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || 8 || 5 || 12 || (1) || (18) || (19) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: tech. non-qualifying expense || (21) || (24) || (45) || (23) || (42) || (65) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (expense)/benefit attr. to policyholders || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP before NCI''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(60)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(102)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(162)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(118)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(15)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(133)''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(60)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(102)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(162)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(118)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(15)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(133)''' |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan="7" style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | Ratios (% of insurance revenue) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: catastrophes || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: discount impact (curr. AY) || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: PYD || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio<sup>2</sup> || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Combined ratio''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
|} |
|||
- name: Life and Savings |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right" |
|||
notes: |
|||
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance — P&C Eliminations, Overview (USD mm) and Ratios, FY24–FY25 |
|||
- Recovering from last year's challenging macroeconomic environment. |
|||
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:6em" | FY25 |
|||
- Still affected by modest growth and economic/political uncertainties. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue<sup>1</sup> || (1,232) || (1,367) || (2,598) || (1,292) || (1,429) || (2,721) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: losses, gross || 487 || 1,272 || 1,758 || 360 || 635 || 996 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: expenses, gross || (2) || 1 || (1) || (5) || (5) || (9) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net expenses from reins. contracts held<sup>1</sup> || 746 || 94 || 840 || 936 || 798 || 1,734 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Insurance service result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (1) || (1) || (2) || 1 || 0 || 1 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Fee result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(1)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(1)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''(2)''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || 1 || 1 || 2 || (1) || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: tech. non-qualifying expense || 1 || 1 || 2 || (1) || 0 || (1) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (expense)/benefit attr. to policyholders || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP before NCI''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''0''' |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan="7" style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | Ratios (% of insurance revenue) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: catastrophes || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: discount impact (curr. AY) || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: PYD || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio<sup>2</sup> || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. || n.m. |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Combined ratio''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''n.m.''' |
|||
|} |
|||
- name: Health |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:right" |
|||
notes: |
|||
|+ 📊 Zurich Insurance — P&C Total, Overview (USD mm) and Ratios, FY24–FY25 |
|||
- Private insurers facing ageing population, claims cost inflation, and strains on national healthcare systems. |
|||
! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | 1H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | 2H24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | FY24 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | 1H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | 2H25 !! style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:right; width:9em" | FY25 |
|||
- Implementing progressive price increases. |
|||
|- |
|||
- Focusing on digital transformation, including care pathway management and wellness benefits. |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Insurance revenue<sup>1</sup> || 21,446 || 23,346 || 44,792 || 23,014 || 25,220 || 48,234 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: losses, gross || (12,108) || (14,458) || (26,566) || (12,384) || (14,818) || (27,202) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Ins. service expense: expenses, gross || (5,722) || (6,191) || (11,913) || (6,432) || (7,009) || (13,441) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net expenses from reins. contracts held<sup>1</sup> || (1,753) || (1,059) || (2,812) || (1,972) || (1,075) || (3,047) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Insurance service result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,863''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,637''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''3,500''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,227''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,318''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''4,545''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net inv. income on Group inv. || 1,233 || 1,270 || 2,503 || 1,276 || 1,359 || 2,635 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Net capital gains/(losses) on Group inv. || 152 || 117 || 269 || 36 || 175 || 211 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result on Group inv.''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,386''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,387''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,772''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,312''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,534''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,846''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Re-/Ins. finance income/(expenses) || (588) || (645) || (1,233) || (659) || (679) || (1,338) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Net inv. result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''797''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''742''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,539''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''653''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''855''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,508''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee income || 243 || 240 || 483 || 267 || 263 || 530 |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Fee business expenses || (186) || (200) || (385) || (227) || (221) || (448) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Fee result''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''57''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''40''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''98''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''40''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''43''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''83''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Other result || (420) || (359) || (779) || (413) || (435) || (848) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: tech. non-qualifying expense || (484) || (436) || (919) || (479) || (518) || (997) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Income tax (expense)/benefit attr. to policyholders || (2) || (3) || (5) || 0 || (2) || (2) |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP before NCI''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,296''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,058''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''4,353''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,507''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,779''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''5,286''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | NCI || 71 || 78 || 149 || 78 || 79 || 157 |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''BOP''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,224''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''1,980''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''4,204''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,429''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''2,700''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''5,129''' |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan="7" style="background:#eaecf0; text-align:left" | Ratios (% of insurance revenue) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Loss ratio || 64.6% || 66.5% || 65.6% || 62.4% || 63.0% || 62.7% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: catastrophes || 2.4% || 3.7% || 3.1% || 1.8% || 0.6% || 1.2% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: discount impact (curr. AY) || -4.0% || -3.2% || -3.6% || -3.5% || -3.1% || -3.3% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | of which: PYD || -1.6% || -1.5% || -1.6% || -1.8% || -1.7% || -1.8% |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:left" | Expense ratio<sup>2</sup> || 28.9% || 28.4% || 28.6% || 30.0% || 29.8% || 29.9% |
|||
|- style="background:#eef1f5" |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left" | '''Combined ratio''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''93.6%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''94.9%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''94.2%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''92.4%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''92.9%''' |
|||
| style="border-top:2px solid #a2a9b1" | '''92.6%''' |
|||
|} |
|||
- region: Japan |
|||
<sup>1</sup> Includes add-back and international programs business |
|||
segments: |
|||
<sup>2</sup> Includes insurance service expenses reported in the insurance service result, as well as technical non-qualifying expenses reported in the other result |
|||
- name: Life insurance |
|||
performance: |
|||
gwp_growth_yoy: +5% |
|||
notes: |
|||
- Growth driven by strong sales of traditional General Account Savings products. |
|||
- Higher guarantees offered as a result of rising Japanese interest rates. |
|||
- Major insurers' net income boosted by favorable Japanese equity market performance. |
|||
- name: Property & Casualty |
|||
performance: |
|||
gwp_growth_yoy: +3% |
|||
notes: |
|||
- Driven by price increases in Motor and Fire insurance. |
|||
- region: Hong Kong |
|||
segments: |
|||
- name: Life insurance |
|||
performance: |
|||
gwp_growth_yoy: +8% |
|||
new_business_growth_yoy: +16% |
|||
notes: |
|||
- New business growth derived from non-Linked individual business. |
|||
- Mainland China Visitors new business slightly decreased vs. 2023. |
|||
- Mainland China Visitors represented 28% of total Individual business. |
|||
- name: Property & Casualty |
|||
notes: |
|||
- Market remained stable. |
|||
- region: United States |
|||
segments: |
|||
- name: Property insurance |
|||
notes: |
|||
- Rates rose, though at a slower pace than prior years. |
|||
- Strict underwriting across capacity deployment, risk selection, and terms and conditions. |
|||
- Adversely impacted by increased frequency of Nat Cat events, particularly secondary perils. |
|||
- Rising reinsurance costs and economic inflation drove up construction costs. |
|||
- name: Casualty insurance |
|||
notes: |
|||
- Continues to experience rate increases due to loss trends. |
|||
- Elevated casualty claims from social inflation have impacted underwriting margins and reserves. |
|||
- region: Global |
|||
segments: |
|||
- name: Reinsurance |
|||
notes: |
|||
- Market remains well-capitalized; companies successfully raised capital to support growth. |
|||
- Property reinsurance saw increased rates and attachment points, improving margins. |
|||
- Realignment of property catastrophe risk allowed reinsurers to limit losses despite active weather patterns. |
|||
- Strong underwriting performance and improved investment returns helped mitigate adverse prior-year reserve development in US casualty business. |
|||
</syntaxhighlight> |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:48, 27 April 2026
topic: Global insurance markets
year: 2024
source: Activity report - Full Year 2024
markets:
- region: France
segments:
- name: Savings insurance
performance:
premium_growth_yoy: +14%
total_premiums_eur_bn: 173
sub_products:
- name: Unit-linked
growth_yoy: +8%
share_of_total: 38% # down from 40% in 2023
- name: General Account
growth_yoy: +17%
notes:
- Saving ratio increased amid economic, fiscal, and political uncertainty.
- Stagnant real estate market supported net flows into Life insurance.
- Surrenders decreased in General Account funds despite Livret A rate held at 3%.
- Surrenders increased in Unit-linked products, partially offsetting the GA decrease.
- name: Protection and Complementary Health insurance
notes:
- Medical inflation partly absorbed via average tariff increase of 8% in 2024.
- Cost and frequency of claims both rose.
- Political uncertainty around the Sécurité Sociale budget may drive further tariff increases as state reimbursement share decreases.
- name: Property & Casualty
notes:
- Motor claims rose due to driver behavior and higher repair costs.
natural_catastrophes:
- event: Cyclone Belal (overseas)
estimated_cost_eur_bn: 0.1
- event: Cyclone Chido (overseas)
estimated_cost_eur_bn_range: [0.65, 0.8]
- event: Floods (including Kirk depression)
estimated_cost_eur_bn_range: [0.35, 0.42]
- region: Europe (excluding France)
segments:
- name: Property & Casualty
notes:
- Faced rising repair costs amid persistent but moderating inflation.
- Evolving risks including climate change.
- Multiple but less severe weather events, mainly hailstorms and floods across most geographies.
- Insurers responding via pricing measures, product reshaping, and updated risk management practices.
- name: Life and Savings
notes:
- Recovering from last year's challenging macroeconomic environment.
- Still affected by modest growth and economic/political uncertainties.
- name: Health
notes:
- Private insurers facing ageing population, claims cost inflation, and strains on national healthcare systems.
- Implementing progressive price increases.
- Focusing on digital transformation, including care pathway management and wellness benefits.
- region: Japan
segments:
- name: Life insurance
performance:
gwp_growth_yoy: +5%
notes:
- Growth driven by strong sales of traditional General Account Savings products.
- Higher guarantees offered as a result of rising Japanese interest rates.
- Major insurers' net income boosted by favorable Japanese equity market performance.
- name: Property & Casualty
performance:
gwp_growth_yoy: +3%
notes:
- Driven by price increases in Motor and Fire insurance.
- region: Hong Kong
segments:
- name: Life insurance
performance:
gwp_growth_yoy: +8%
new_business_growth_yoy: +16%
notes:
- New business growth derived from non-Linked individual business.
- Mainland China Visitors new business slightly decreased vs. 2023.
- Mainland China Visitors represented 28% of total Individual business.
- name: Property & Casualty
notes:
- Market remained stable.
- region: United States
segments:
- name: Property insurance
notes:
- Rates rose, though at a slower pace than prior years.
- Strict underwriting across capacity deployment, risk selection, and terms and conditions.
- Adversely impacted by increased frequency of Nat Cat events, particularly secondary perils.
- Rising reinsurance costs and economic inflation drove up construction costs.
- name: Casualty insurance
notes:
- Continues to experience rate increases due to loss trends.
- Elevated casualty claims from social inflation have impacted underwriting margins and reserves.
- region: Global
segments:
- name: Reinsurance
notes:
- Market remains well-capitalized; companies successfully raised capital to support growth.
- Property reinsurance saw increased rates and attachment points, improving margins.
- Realignment of property catastrophe risk allowed reinsurers to limit losses despite active weather patterns.
- Strong underwriting performance and improved investment returns helped mitigate adverse prior-year reserve development in US casualty business.