Home: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (228 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- |
|||
<div style="clear:both; width:100%; box-sizing:border-box; margin:0 0 2em 0; padding:.5em; border:0px solid #9CA4AC; border-radius:0px; background:#F9F8F4;"> |
|||
<div class="fullscreen-logo"> |
|||
{{Quote of the day}} |
|||
[[File:Logo of Insurer Brain.svg|frameless|center|link=]] |
|||
</div> |
</div> |
||
--> |
|||
{{Main Page/Skill-building books}} |
|||
'''Did you know?''' |
|||
__NOCACHE__ |
__NOCACHE__ |
||
{{#switch: {{#expr: {{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} mod 100}} |
|||
| 0 = {{:Definition:Bordereaux}} |
|||
| 1 = {{:Definition:Burning cost}} |
|||
| 2 = {{:Definition:Commutation (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 3 = {{:Definition:Finite reinsurance}} |
|||
| 4 = {{:Definition:Fronting}} |
|||
| 5 = {{:Definition:Follow-the-fortunes}} |
|||
| 6 = {{:Definition:Cut-through clause}} |
|||
| 7 = {{:Definition:Binding authority}} |
|||
| 8 = {{:Definition:Clash cover}} |
|||
| 9 = {{:Definition:Attachment point}} |
|||
| 10 = {{:Definition:Exhaustion point}} |
|||
| 11 = {{:Definition:Reinstatement premium}} |
|||
| 12 = {{:Definition:Sliding-scale commission}} |
|||
| 13 = {{:Definition:Profit commission}} |
|||
| 14 = {{:Definition:Loss portfolio transfer}} |
|||
| 15 = {{:Definition:Adverse development cover (ADC)}} |
|||
| 16 = {{:Definition:Aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 17 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 18 = {{:Definition:Per-risk excess of loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 19 = {{:Definition:Risks-attaching basis}} |
|||
| 20 = {{:Definition:Losses-occurring basis}} |
|||
| 21 = {{:Definition:Claims-made trigger}} |
|||
| 22 = {{:Definition:Signing down}} |
|||
| 23 = {{:Definition:Sunset clause}} |
|||
| 24 = {{:Definition:Utmost good faith}} |
|||
| 25 = {{:Definition:Contra proferentem}} |
|||
| 26 = {{:Definition:Incurred but not reported (IBNR)}} |
|||
| 27 = {{:Definition:Bornhuetter-Ferguson method}} |
|||
| 28 = {{:Definition:Chain-ladder method}} |
|||
| 29 = {{:Definition:Stochastic reserving}} |
|||
| 30 = {{:Definition:Loss development triangle}} |
|||
| 31 = {{:Definition:Credibility factor}} |
|||
| 32 = {{:Definition:Allocated loss adjustment expense (ALAE)}} |
|||
| 33 = {{:Definition:Unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE)}} |
|||
| 34 = {{:Definition:Experience modification factor}} |
|||
| 35 = {{:Definition:Industry loss warranty (ILW)}} |
|||
| 36 = {{:Definition:Sidecar (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 37 = {{:Definition:Collateralized reinsurance}} |
|||
| 38 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe bond (CAT bond)}} |
|||
| 39 = {{:Definition:Retrocession}} |
|||
| 40 = {{:Definition:Surplus share reinsurance}} |
|||
| 41 = {{:Definition:Surplus strain}} |
|||
| 42 = {{:Definition:Surplus relief}} |
|||
| 43 = {{:Definition:Funds withheld reinsurance}} |
|||
| 44 = {{:Definition:Modified coinsurance}} |
|||
| 45 = {{:Definition:Coinsurance penalty}} |
|||
| 46 = {{:Definition:Anti-concurrent causation clause}} |
|||
| 47 = {{:Definition:Continuous trigger}} |
|||
| 48 = {{:Definition:Efficient proximate cause}} |
|||
| 49 = {{:Definition:Horizontal exhaustion}} |
|||
| 50 = {{:Definition:Vertical exhaustion}} |
|||
| 51 = {{:Definition:Sue and labor clause}} |
|||
| 52 = {{:Definition:Honorable engagement clause}} |
|||
| 53 = {{:Definition:Hours clause}} |
|||
| 54 = {{:Definition:Batch clause}} |
|||
| 55 = {{:Definition:Aggregation clause}} |
|||
| 56 = {{:Definition:Omnibus clause}} |
|||
| 57 = {{:Definition:Running down clause}} |
|||
| 58 = {{:Definition:Warehouse-to-warehouse clause}} |
|||
| 59 = {{:Definition:General average}} |
|||
| 60 = {{:Definition:Particular average}} |
|||
| 61 = {{:Definition:Constructive total loss}} |
|||
| 62 = {{:Definition:York-Antwerp Rules}} |
|||
| 63 = {{:Definition:Protection and indemnity (P&I)}} |
|||
| 64 = {{:Definition:Demand surge}} |
|||
| 65 = {{:Definition:Social inflation}} |
|||
| 66 = {{:Definition:Nuclear verdict}} |
|||
| 67 = {{:Definition:Silent cyber}} |
|||
| 68 = {{:Definition:Affirmative cyber coverage}} |
|||
| 69 = {{:Definition:Parametric insurance}} |
|||
| 70 = {{:Definition:Embedded insurance}} |
|||
| 71 = {{:Definition:Takaful}} |
|||
| 72 = {{:Definition:Bancassurance}} |
|||
| 73 = {{:Definition:Microinsurance}} |
|||
| 74 = {{:Definition:Captive insurance company}} |
|||
| 75 = {{:Definition:Cell captive}} |
|||
| 76 = {{:Definition:Protected cell company (PCC)}} |
|||
| 77 = {{:Definition:Reciprocal insurance exchange}} |
|||
| 78 = {{:Definition:Risk retention group (RRG)}} |
|||
| 79 = {{:Definition:Lloyd's syndicate}} |
|||
| 80 = {{:Definition:Reinsurance to close (RITC)}} |
|||
| 81 = {{:Definition:Equitas}} |
|||
| 82 = {{:Definition:Funds at Lloyd's (FAL)}} |
|||
| 83 = {{:Definition:Syndicate-in-a-box (SIAB)}} |
|||
| 84 = {{:Definition:Part VII transfer}} |
|||
| 85 = {{:Definition:Solvent scheme of arrangement}} |
|||
| 86 = {{:Definition:Run-off (insurance)}} |
|||
| 87 = {{:Definition:Demutualization}} |
|||
| 88 = {{:Definition:Depopulation program}} |
|||
| 89 = {{:Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML)}} |
|||
| 90 = {{:Definition:Exceedance probability curve (EP curve)}} |
|||
| 91 = {{:Definition:Realistic disaster scenario (RDS)}} |
|||
| 92 = {{:Definition:Monte Carlo simulation}} |
|||
| 93 = {{:Definition:Copula}} |
|||
| 94 = {{:Definition:Bühlmann model}} |
|||
| 95 = {{:Definition:Cape Cod method}} |
|||
| 96 = {{:Definition:Extra-contractual obligation (ECO)}} |
|||
| 97 = {{:Definition:Loss in excess of policy limits (XPL)}} |
|||
| 98 = {{:Definition:Doctrine of reasonable expectations}} |
|||
| 99 = {{:Definition:Longevity swap}} |
|||
}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 12 March 2026
Did you know?
📐 Bornhuetter-Ferguson method is an actuarial reserving technique used by insurance companies and reinsurers to estimate ultimate incurred losses by blending two inputs: actual reported (or paid) loss experience to date and an independent, a priori estimate of expected losses — typically derived from pricing assumptions, industry benchmarks, or the company's own loss ratio expectations.
🔧 The method works by splitting the ultimate loss estimate into two components. The portion of losses already reported is taken at face value from the loss development data. The remaining unreported portion is estimated by applying the a priori expected loss ratio to earned premium, then weighting it by the proportion of losses still expected to emerge based on historical development patterns. This dual-source approach makes Bornhuetter-Ferguson particularly valuable for immature accident years or long-tail lines such as general liability, professional liability, and medical malpractice, where early reported data can be sparse and highly volatile. Compared to the pure chain-ladder method, which relies entirely on extrapolating past development, Bornhuetter-Ferguson dampens the impact of unusually high or low early claims activity that might distort projections.
📊 Actuaries across the industry regard this method as a cornerstone of the reserving toolkit because it balances responsiveness to emerging experience with the stability of a prior expectation. Regulators and rating agencies expect insurers to use multiple reserving methods — and the Bornhuetter-Ferguson approach frequently appears alongside the chain-ladder and expected loss ratio methods in actuarial opinions and reserve studies. Its reliability, however, depends heavily on the quality of the a priori loss assumption; an inaccurate starting estimate will propagate through the unreported portion, which is why experienced actuaries stress-test inputs and triangulate results across techniques before recommending final carried reserves.
Related concepts