Home: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (270 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- |
|||
{{Quote of the day}} |
|||
<div class="fullscreen-logo"> |
|||
[[File:Logo of Insurer Brain.svg|frameless|center|link=]] |
|||
== Skill-building book summaries == |
|||
</div> |
|||
''Looking to grow your skills? Start with our latest book summaries:'' |
|||
--> |
|||
'''Did you know?''' |
|||
🌱 [[Tiny habits (2019) – BJ Fogg]]. Start absurdly small and celebrate to rewire behaviour. |
|||
__NOCACHE__ |
|||
{{#switch: {{#expr: {{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} mod 100}} |
|||
⚛️ [[Atomic habits (2018) – James Clear]]. Compound small improvements with clear systems. |
|||
| 0 = {{:Definition:Bordereaux}} |
|||
| 1 = {{:Definition:Burning cost}} |
|||
💥[[The power of habit (2012) – Charles Duhigg]]. Use cue–routine–reward to change outcomes. |
|||
| 2 = {{:Definition:Commutation (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 3 = {{:Definition:Finite reinsurance}} |
|||
🥂 [[Never eat alone (2005) – Keith Ferrazzi and Tahl Raz]]. Build relationships with consistent, generous outreach. |
|||
| 4 = {{:Definition:Fronting}} |
|||
| 5 = {{:Definition:Follow-the-fortunes}} |
|||
✅ [[Getting things done (2001) – David Allen]]. Capture and clarify to achieve stress-free productivity. |
|||
| 6 = {{:Definition:Cut-through clause}} |
|||
| 7 = {{:Definition:Binding authority}} |
|||
🤗 [[How to win friends and influence people (1936) – Dale Carnegie]]. Use timeless rules for rapport and persuasion. |
|||
| 8 = {{:Definition:Clash cover}} |
|||
| 9 = {{:Definition:Attachment point}} |
|||
== Inspirational quotes == |
|||
| 10 = {{:Definition:Exhaustion point}} |
|||
''Need a spark of inspiration to lift your day or shift your perspective? Explore our latest collection of quotes:'' |
|||
| 11 = {{:Definition:Reinstatement premium}} |
|||
| 12 = {{:Definition:Sliding-scale commission}} |
|||
✨ [[Quotes about the meaning of life]] |
|||
| 13 = {{:Definition:Profit commission}} |
|||
| 14 = {{:Definition:Loss portfolio transfer}} |
|||
| 15 = {{:Definition:Adverse development cover (ADC)}} |
|||
| 16 = {{:Definition:Aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 17 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 18 = {{:Definition:Per-risk excess of loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 19 = {{:Definition:Risks-attaching basis}} |
|||
| 20 = {{:Definition:Losses-occurring basis}} |
|||
| 21 = {{:Definition:Claims-made trigger}} |
|||
| 22 = {{:Definition:Signing down}} |
|||
| 23 = {{:Definition:Sunset clause}} |
|||
| 24 = {{:Definition:Utmost good faith}} |
|||
| 25 = {{:Definition:Contra proferentem}} |
|||
| 26 = {{:Definition:Incurred but not reported (IBNR)}} |
|||
| 27 = {{:Definition:Bornhuetter-Ferguson method}} |
|||
| 28 = {{:Definition:Chain-ladder method}} |
|||
| 29 = {{:Definition:Stochastic reserving}} |
|||
| 30 = {{:Definition:Loss development triangle}} |
|||
| 31 = {{:Definition:Credibility factor}} |
|||
| 32 = {{:Definition:Allocated loss adjustment expense (ALAE)}} |
|||
| 33 = {{:Definition:Unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE)}} |
|||
| 34 = {{:Definition:Experience modification factor}} |
|||
| 35 = {{:Definition:Industry loss warranty (ILW)}} |
|||
| 36 = {{:Definition:Sidecar (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 37 = {{:Definition:Collateralized reinsurance}} |
|||
| 38 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe bond (CAT bond)}} |
|||
| 39 = {{:Definition:Retrocession}} |
|||
| 40 = {{:Definition:Surplus share reinsurance}} |
|||
| 41 = {{:Definition:Surplus strain}} |
|||
| 42 = {{:Definition:Surplus relief}} |
|||
| 43 = {{:Definition:Funds withheld reinsurance}} |
|||
| 44 = {{:Definition:Modified coinsurance}} |
|||
| 45 = {{:Definition:Coinsurance penalty}} |
|||
| 46 = {{:Definition:Anti-concurrent causation clause}} |
|||
| 47 = {{:Definition:Continuous trigger}} |
|||
| 48 = {{:Definition:Efficient proximate cause}} |
|||
| 49 = {{:Definition:Horizontal exhaustion}} |
|||
| 50 = {{:Definition:Vertical exhaustion}} |
|||
| 51 = {{:Definition:Sue and labor clause}} |
|||
| 52 = {{:Definition:Honorable engagement clause}} |
|||
| 53 = {{:Definition:Hours clause}} |
|||
| 54 = {{:Definition:Batch clause}} |
|||
| 55 = {{:Definition:Aggregation clause}} |
|||
| 56 = {{:Definition:Omnibus clause}} |
|||
| 57 = {{:Definition:Running down clause}} |
|||
| 58 = {{:Definition:Warehouse-to-warehouse clause}} |
|||
| 59 = {{:Definition:General average}} |
|||
| 60 = {{:Definition:Particular average}} |
|||
| 61 = {{:Definition:Constructive total loss}} |
|||
| 62 = {{:Definition:York-Antwerp Rules}} |
|||
| 63 = {{:Definition:Protection and indemnity (P&I)}} |
|||
| 64 = {{:Definition:Demand surge}} |
|||
| 65 = {{:Definition:Social inflation}} |
|||
| 66 = {{:Definition:Nuclear verdict}} |
|||
| 67 = {{:Definition:Silent cyber}} |
|||
| 68 = {{:Definition:Affirmative cyber coverage}} |
|||
| 69 = {{:Definition:Parametric insurance}} |
|||
| 70 = {{:Definition:Embedded insurance}} |
|||
| 71 = {{:Definition:Takaful}} |
|||
| 72 = {{:Definition:Bancassurance}} |
|||
| 73 = {{:Definition:Microinsurance}} |
|||
| 74 = {{:Definition:Captive insurance company}} |
|||
| 75 = {{:Definition:Cell captive}} |
|||
| 76 = {{:Definition:Protected cell company (PCC)}} |
|||
| 77 = {{:Definition:Reciprocal insurance exchange}} |
|||
| 78 = {{:Definition:Risk retention group (RRG)}} |
|||
| 79 = {{:Definition:Lloyd's syndicate}} |
|||
| 80 = {{:Definition:Reinsurance to close (RITC)}} |
|||
| 81 = {{:Definition:Equitas}} |
|||
| 82 = {{:Definition:Funds at Lloyd's (FAL)}} |
|||
| 83 = {{:Definition:Syndicate-in-a-box (SIAB)}} |
|||
| 84 = {{:Definition:Part VII transfer}} |
|||
| 85 = {{:Definition:Solvent scheme of arrangement}} |
|||
| 86 = {{:Definition:Run-off (insurance)}} |
|||
| 87 = {{:Definition:Demutualization}} |
|||
| 88 = {{:Definition:Depopulation program}} |
|||
| 89 = {{:Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML)}} |
|||
| 90 = {{:Definition:Exceedance probability curve (EP curve)}} |
|||
| 91 = {{:Definition:Realistic disaster scenario (RDS)}} |
|||
| 92 = {{:Definition:Monte Carlo simulation}} |
|||
| 93 = {{:Definition:Copula}} |
|||
| 94 = {{:Definition:Bühlmann model}} |
|||
| 95 = {{:Definition:Cape Cod method}} |
|||
| 96 = {{:Definition:Extra-contractual obligation (ECO)}} |
|||
| 97 = {{:Definition:Loss in excess of policy limits (XPL)}} |
|||
| 98 = {{:Definition:Doctrine of reasonable expectations}} |
|||
| 99 = {{:Definition:Longevity swap}} |
|||
}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 12 March 2026
Did you know?
🔥 Burning cost is an actuarial and reinsurance pricing metric that expresses historical incurred losses as a proportion of subject premium or exposure over a defined period, providing a baseline for estimating what a layer of coverage has actually "cost" in pure loss terms before any loading for expenses, profit, or risk margin. In reinsurance negotiations, it serves as a foundational data point: both cedents and reinsurers examine the burning cost to anchor discussions about the appropriate rate for excess-of-loss treaties and similar structures.
📊 Calculating the burning cost involves dividing the total losses that penetrate a specific retention or attachment point by the total subject premium base, typically computed across multiple underwriting years to smooth volatility. For example, if a cedent cedes losses above $5 million per occurrence and total losses piercing that layer over five years amount to $12 million against $200 million in cumulative subject premium, the burning cost is 6%. Analysts often adjust historical figures using loss development factors and trend factors to bring past experience to a current-year cost level, accounting for claims inflation and changes in exposure. The result is a "trended and developed" burning cost that more accurately reflects the expected future loss rate for the layer in question.
📈 As a pricing tool, the burning cost carries particular weight because it is grounded in actual loss experience rather than theoretical models alone. However, experienced reinsurance brokers and underwriters recognize its limitations — it can understate risk in periods of benign loss activity and may not capture emerging catastrophe or systemic risks that historical data simply hasn't recorded. For this reason, reinsurers typically treat the burning cost as a floor or starting point, layering on risk loads, expense margins, and adjustments informed by catastrophe models or forward-looking exposure analysis. In today's market, insurtech platforms are automating burning cost calculations by integrating real-time bordereaux data and loss runs, reducing the time required to prepare renewal submissions and improving the transparency of treaty pricing discussions.
Related concepts: