Home: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (177 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- |
|||
{{Insert top}}{{Insert quote panel |
|||
<div class="fullscreen-logo"> |
|||
| {{Main Page/random quote}} |
|||
[[File:Logo of Insurer Brain.svg|frameless|center|link=]] |
|||
</div> |
|||
--> |
|||
'''Did you know?''' |
|||
__NOCACHE__ |
|||
{{#switch: {{#expr: {{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} mod 100}} |
|||
| 0 = {{:Definition:Bordereaux}} |
|||
| 1 = {{:Definition:Burning cost}} |
|||
| 2 = {{:Definition:Commutation (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 3 = {{:Definition:Finite reinsurance}} |
|||
| 4 = {{:Definition:Fronting}} |
|||
| 5 = {{:Definition:Follow-the-fortunes}} |
|||
| 6 = {{:Definition:Cut-through clause}} |
|||
| 7 = {{:Definition:Binding authority}} |
|||
| 8 = {{:Definition:Clash cover}} |
|||
| 9 = {{:Definition:Attachment point}} |
|||
| 10 = {{:Definition:Exhaustion point}} |
|||
| 11 = {{:Definition:Reinstatement premium}} |
|||
| 12 = {{:Definition:Sliding-scale commission}} |
|||
| 13 = {{:Definition:Profit commission}} |
|||
| 14 = {{:Definition:Loss portfolio transfer}} |
|||
| 15 = {{:Definition:Adverse development cover (ADC)}} |
|||
| 16 = {{:Definition:Aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 17 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 18 = {{:Definition:Per-risk excess of loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 19 = {{:Definition:Risks-attaching basis}} |
|||
| 20 = {{:Definition:Losses-occurring basis}} |
|||
| 21 = {{:Definition:Claims-made trigger}} |
|||
| 22 = {{:Definition:Signing down}} |
|||
| 23 = {{:Definition:Sunset clause}} |
|||
| 24 = {{:Definition:Utmost good faith}} |
|||
| 25 = {{:Definition:Contra proferentem}} |
|||
| 26 = {{:Definition:Incurred but not reported (IBNR)}} |
|||
| 27 = {{:Definition:Bornhuetter-Ferguson method}} |
|||
| 28 = {{:Definition:Chain-ladder method}} |
|||
| 29 = {{:Definition:Stochastic reserving}} |
|||
| 30 = {{:Definition:Loss development triangle}} |
|||
| 31 = {{:Definition:Credibility factor}} |
|||
| 32 = {{:Definition:Allocated loss adjustment expense (ALAE)}} |
|||
| 33 = {{:Definition:Unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE)}} |
|||
| 34 = {{:Definition:Experience modification factor}} |
|||
| 35 = {{:Definition:Industry loss warranty (ILW)}} |
|||
| 36 = {{:Definition:Sidecar (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 37 = {{:Definition:Collateralized reinsurance}} |
|||
| 38 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe bond (CAT bond)}} |
|||
| 39 = {{:Definition:Retrocession}} |
|||
| 40 = {{:Definition:Surplus share reinsurance}} |
|||
| 41 = {{:Definition:Surplus strain}} |
|||
| 42 = {{:Definition:Surplus relief}} |
|||
| 43 = {{:Definition:Funds withheld reinsurance}} |
|||
| 44 = {{:Definition:Modified coinsurance}} |
|||
| 45 = {{:Definition:Coinsurance penalty}} |
|||
| 46 = {{:Definition:Anti-concurrent causation clause}} |
|||
| 47 = {{:Definition:Continuous trigger}} |
|||
| 48 = {{:Definition:Efficient proximate cause}} |
|||
| 49 = {{:Definition:Horizontal exhaustion}} |
|||
| 50 = {{:Definition:Vertical exhaustion}} |
|||
| 51 = {{:Definition:Sue and labor clause}} |
|||
| 52 = {{:Definition:Honorable engagement clause}} |
|||
| 53 = {{:Definition:Hours clause}} |
|||
| 54 = {{:Definition:Batch clause}} |
|||
| 55 = {{:Definition:Aggregation clause}} |
|||
| 56 = {{:Definition:Omnibus clause}} |
|||
| 57 = {{:Definition:Running down clause}} |
|||
| 58 = {{:Definition:Warehouse-to-warehouse clause}} |
|||
| 59 = {{:Definition:General average}} |
|||
| 60 = {{:Definition:Particular average}} |
|||
| 61 = {{:Definition:Constructive total loss}} |
|||
| 62 = {{:Definition:York-Antwerp Rules}} |
|||
| 63 = {{:Definition:Protection and indemnity (P&I)}} |
|||
| 64 = {{:Definition:Demand surge}} |
|||
| 65 = {{:Definition:Social inflation}} |
|||
| 66 = {{:Definition:Nuclear verdict}} |
|||
| 67 = {{:Definition:Silent cyber}} |
|||
| 68 = {{:Definition:Affirmative cyber coverage}} |
|||
| 69 = {{:Definition:Parametric insurance}} |
|||
| 70 = {{:Definition:Embedded insurance}} |
|||
| 71 = {{:Definition:Takaful}} |
|||
| 72 = {{:Definition:Bancassurance}} |
|||
| 73 = {{:Definition:Microinsurance}} |
|||
| 74 = {{:Definition:Captive insurance company}} |
|||
| 75 = {{:Definition:Cell captive}} |
|||
| 76 = {{:Definition:Protected cell company (PCC)}} |
|||
| 77 = {{:Definition:Reciprocal insurance exchange}} |
|||
| 78 = {{:Definition:Risk retention group (RRG)}} |
|||
| 79 = {{:Definition:Lloyd's syndicate}} |
|||
| 80 = {{:Definition:Reinsurance to close (RITC)}} |
|||
| 81 = {{:Definition:Equitas}} |
|||
| 82 = {{:Definition:Funds at Lloyd's (FAL)}} |
|||
| 83 = {{:Definition:Syndicate-in-a-box (SIAB)}} |
|||
| 84 = {{:Definition:Part VII transfer}} |
|||
| 85 = {{:Definition:Solvent scheme of arrangement}} |
|||
| 86 = {{:Definition:Run-off (insurance)}} |
|||
| 87 = {{:Definition:Demutualization}} |
|||
| 88 = {{:Definition:Depopulation program}} |
|||
| 89 = {{:Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML)}} |
|||
| 90 = {{:Definition:Exceedance probability curve (EP curve)}} |
|||
| 91 = {{:Definition:Realistic disaster scenario (RDS)}} |
|||
| 92 = {{:Definition:Monte Carlo simulation}} |
|||
| 93 = {{:Definition:Copula}} |
|||
| 94 = {{:Definition:Bühlmann model}} |
|||
| 95 = {{:Definition:Cape Cod method}} |
|||
| 96 = {{:Definition:Extra-contractual obligation (ECO)}} |
|||
| 97 = {{:Definition:Loss in excess of policy limits (XPL)}} |
|||
| 98 = {{:Definition:Doctrine of reasonable expectations}} |
|||
| 99 = {{:Definition:Longevity swap}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== 📚 biz/books == |
|||
{{Main Page/biz/books}} |
|||
<div style="text-align: right;"> |
|||
[[biz/books|more books ▸]] |
|||
</div> |
|||
{{Section separator}} |
|||
== 👥 biz/people == |
|||
[[List of CEOs of CAC 40 companies|<u>'''CEOs of CAC 40 companies'''</u>]] / discover the portraits of the captains of French industry. |
|||
<div style="text-align: right;"> |
|||
[[biz/people|more people ▸]] |
|||
</div> |
|||
{{Section separator}} |
|||
== 😜 biz/fun == |
|||
[[CEO jokes|<u>'''CEO jokes'''</u>]] / take things lightly and laugh at the biggest boss. |
|||
<div style="text-align: right;"> |
|||
[[biz/people|more fun ▸]] |
|||
</div> |
|||
{{Section separator}} |
|||
== 🏢 biz/hubs == |
|||
{{div col|colwidth=10em}} |
|||
* [[biz/books]] |
|||
* [[biz/people]] |
|||
* [[biz/fun]] |
|||
{{div col end}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 12 March 2026
Did you know?
🔁 Reinstatement premium is an additional premium that a ceding insurer must pay to restore the full limit of a reinsurance contract after a loss has partially or fully exhausted the original coverage. Common in excess of loss reinsurance treaties and catastrophe reinsurance programs, this mechanism ensures that the ceding company can replenish its reinsurance protection for subsequent events during the contract period rather than being left exposed after a single large loss or catastrophe. The concept reflects the reality that reinsurance capacity is finite — once it is consumed, it must be explicitly renewed.
⚙️ Treaty language specifies the reinstatement terms at inception, including how many reinstatements are available, whether they are automatic or require mutual agreement, and the pricing formula applied. A typical provision might offer one or two reinstatements, each priced as a pro-rata portion of the original premium adjusted for the remaining term of the contract. For example, if a cat layer with an annual premium of $1 million suffers a full-limit loss halfway through the policy year, the reinstatement premium might be calculated at 50% of the original premium — $500,000 — reflecting the six months of remaining coverage. Some treaties offer reinstatements "at no additional premium," though this concession is rare in harder market conditions and typically comes at the cost of a higher original rate. The reinsurance broker plays a key role in negotiating these terms to balance the cedent's need for continuity with the reinsurer's pricing discipline.
💡 Reinstatement premiums are far more than a contractual technicality — they are a critical variable in catastrophe risk management and financial planning. Actuaries and CFOs must model reinstatement costs into their probable maximum loss scenarios and capital adequacy assessments, because a major catastrophe that triggers reinstatements will simultaneously increase costs while the company is absorbing its retained share of losses. Failing to budget for reinstatement premiums can leave an insurer financially strained at the worst possible moment. In catastrophe modeling, reinstatement assumptions also affect the calculation of metrics like average annual loss and tail value at risk, making them integral to the overall reinsurance purchasing strategy.
Related concepts: