<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AWar_and_terrorism_insurance</id>
	<title>Definition:War and terrorism insurance - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AWar_and_terrorism_insurance"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:War_and_terrorism_insurance&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-14T13:55:58Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:War_and_terrorism_insurance&amp;diff=10089&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:War_and_terrorism_insurance&amp;diff=10089&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-11T06:10:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;💣 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;War and terrorism insurance&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; provides coverage for [[Definition:Loss | losses]] arising from acts of war, terrorism, sabotage, or political violence — perils that standard [[Definition:Property insurance | property]] and [[Definition:Casualty insurance | casualty]] policies almost universally [[Definition:Exclusion | exclude]]. The market for this coverage crystallized after the September 11, 2001 attacks, which produced roughly $45 billion in [[Definition:Insured loss | insured losses]] and prompted [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurers]] to withdraw terrorism capacity from conventional treaties virtually overnight. Today the product spans a spectrum from standalone terrorism policies and political violence programs to government-backed [[Definition:Risk pool | risk pools]] such as the U.S. [[Definition:Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) | Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA)]] and the UK&amp;#039;s [[Definition:Pool Re | Pool Re]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ Coverage mechanics depend heavily on whether the risk is classified as a &amp;quot;certified&amp;quot; act of terrorism — a designation made by government authorities under frameworks like TRIA — or falls under broader political violence definitions that include insurrection, civil commotion, coup d&amp;#039;état, or war. Under TRIA, for example, private [[Definition:Insurance carrier | insurers]] must make terrorism coverage available for [[Definition:Commercial lines | commercial lines]] policyholders, and in exchange the federal government acts as a [[Definition:Backstop | backstop]] reinsurer above certain loss thresholds, sharing the financial burden once industry-wide losses surpass a legislated trigger. Outside the U.S., [[Definition:Lloyd&amp;#039;s of London | Lloyd&amp;#039;s of London]] syndicates and specialty [[Definition:Surplus lines | surplus lines]] carriers are among the primary sources of standalone political violence and war risk capacity, often structuring programs with layered [[Definition:Excess of loss | excess of loss]] towers and event-specific [[Definition:Aggregate limit | aggregate limits]]. [[Definition:Underwriting | Underwriters]] rely on threat intelligence, geopolitical risk modeling, and [[Definition:Accumulation management | accumulation management]] analytics to price and manage these exposures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🌍 The relevance of war and terrorism insurance extends well beyond the handful of carriers that write it. Because terrorism exclusions are embedded in nearly every standard [[Definition:Insurance policy | policy form]], [[Definition:Risk manager | risk managers]] across virtually all industries must decide whether to purchase separate terrorism coverage — and the adequacy of that decision affects mortgage requirements, lease obligations, and corporate governance. For the insurance industry as a whole, government backstop programs like TRIA remain a topic of intense [[Definition:Insurance regulation | regulatory]] and legislative debate: critics argue they create [[Definition:Moral hazard | moral hazard]] and crowd out private capacity, while proponents maintain that the catastrophic and unmodellable nature of terrorism makes a public-private partnership indispensable. As geopolitical instability evolves — including [[Definition:Cyber terrorism | cyber terrorism]] threats — the boundaries of what this coverage includes are being tested and reshaped.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Political violence insurance]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Pool Re]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Exclusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Catastrophe risk]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Reinsurance]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>