<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ASecurity_committee</id>
	<title>Definition:Security committee - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ASecurity_committee"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Security_committee&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-14T07:12:33Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Security_committee&amp;diff=16013&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Security_committee&amp;diff=16013&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-15T04:28:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;🔒 A &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;security committee&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the insurance industry refers to a governance body — typically established within a [[Definition:Broker | broking house]], [[Definition:Lloyd&amp;#039;s | Lloyd&amp;#039;s]], or a large [[Definition:Insurance buyer | insurance buyer&amp;#039;s]] organization — charged with evaluating and approving the financial strength and creditworthiness of [[Definition:Insurance carrier | insurers]] and [[Definition:Reinsurer | reinsurers]] before they are permitted to participate on a [[Definition:Insurance program | program]] or accepted as risk-bearing counterparties. The concept is rooted in a fundamental concern: an [[Definition:Insurance policy | insurance policy]] is only as valuable as the insurer&amp;#039;s ability to pay [[Definition:Claim | claims]] when they fall due, and a security committee provides a structured process for vetting that ability. Major international brokers such as [[Definition:Marsh | Marsh]], [[Definition:Aon | Aon]], and [[Definition:Willis Towers Watson | WTW]] maintain dedicated security committees that maintain approved lists of carriers their brokers can place business with, drawing on assessments from [[Definition:Credit rating agency | rating agencies]], regulatory filings, and proprietary financial analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
📋 These committees typically operate by setting minimum criteria — such as a required [[Definition:Financial strength rating | financial strength rating]] from agencies like [[Definition:AM Best | AM Best]], [[Definition:Standard &amp;amp; Poor&amp;#039;s | S&amp;amp;P]], or [[Definition:Moody&amp;#039;s | Moody&amp;#039;s]] — and then conducting deeper analysis for carriers that fall near the threshold or present unusual risk characteristics. The review process considers an insurer&amp;#039;s [[Definition:Capital adequacy | capital adequacy]], [[Definition:Reserve adequacy | reserve adequacy]], [[Definition:Investment portfolio | investment portfolio]] quality, group support, [[Definition:Regulatory oversight | regulatory standing]], and any emerging concerns such as concentration of exposure or management instability. In the [[Definition:Lloyd&amp;#039;s | Lloyd&amp;#039;s]] market, the Corporation of Lloyd&amp;#039;s itself maintains a form of security oversight through its [[Definition:Chain of security | chain of security]] structure, but individual brokers still apply their own security vetting on top of this. For [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurance]] brokers, the security committee function takes on added importance because [[Definition:Reinsurance recoverables | reinsurance recoverables]] — amounts owed by reinsurers on ceded claims — represent a significant balance sheet item for ceding insurers, and a reinsurer default can be devastating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
💡 The practical impact of security committee decisions ripples through the market in ways that are not always visible to end policyholders but are keenly felt by insurers and reinsurers. Being excluded from a major broker&amp;#039;s approved security list can effectively shut a carrier out of substantial deal flow, making security committee approval a commercial imperative rather than a mere formality. Conversely, a newly licensed or newly rated carrier&amp;#039;s first major validation often comes when it gains approval from the security committees of leading brokers. In hard markets, security committees sometimes face pressure to expand approved lists to ensure sufficient capacity is available, while in soft markets, they may tighten criteria to weed out marginal carriers. The security committee function has also evolved to incorporate [[Definition:Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) | ESG]] considerations and [[Definition:Sanctions compliance | sanctions screening]], reflecting broader governance expectations in the modern insurance marketplace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Financial strength rating]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Credit rating agency]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Reinsurance recoverables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Chain of security]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Capital adequacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Counterparty risk]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>