<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ARevenue_multiple</id>
	<title>Definition:Revenue multiple - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ARevenue_multiple"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Revenue_multiple&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-14T17:37:34Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Revenue_multiple&amp;diff=13785&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Revenue_multiple&amp;diff=13785&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-13T13:19:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;💲 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Revenue multiple&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a [[Definition:Valuation | valuation]] metric that expresses a company&amp;#039;s enterprise value or equity value as a ratio to its revenue, and in the insurance and [[Definition:Insurtech | insurtech]] sectors, it has become one of the most widely referenced benchmarks for comparing companies — particularly high-growth ventures that may not yet produce consistent [[Definition:Underwriting income | underwriting profit]] or net income. While traditional [[Definition:Insurance carrier | insurers]] and [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurers]] are more commonly valued on [[Definition:Book value | book value]] multiples or [[Definition:Price-to-earnings ratio | price-to-earnings]] ratios, revenue multiples dominate the valuation conversation for [[Definition:Managing general agent (MGA) | MGAs]], [[Definition:Insurance broker | brokers]], technology-enabled distributors, and early-stage insurtechs where profitability metrics are either negative or not yet meaningful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ The calculation is straightforward — enterprise value divided by trailing or projected revenue — but interpreting the output in an insurance context requires industry-specific judgment. For an MGA, revenue typically means [[Definition:Commission | commission]] and [[Definition:Fee income | fee income]] earned on [[Definition:Gross written premium (GWP) | gross written premium]], not the premium itself, since the MGA does not retain [[Definition:Underwriting risk | underwriting risk]]. For a [[Definition:Broker | broker]], revenue is commission and brokerage fees. For a full-stack insurer, revenue may include net [[Definition:Earned premium | earned premium]], investment income, and fee revenue, making the denominator much larger and the multiple correspondingly lower. A high-growth insurtech MGA might trade at 8 to 15 times revenue in buoyant [[Definition:Capital markets | capital markets]], while a mature [[Definition:Property and casualty insurance | property and casualty]] carrier might trade at 1 to 2 times revenue. These wide ranges reflect differences in growth trajectory, margin profile, capital intensity, and the perceived durability of the business model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
📉 Revenue multiples gained particular prominence during the insurtech funding boom of the late 2010s and early 2020s, when venture capital and [[Definition:Private equity | private equity]] investors poured capital into insurance startups at valuations driven almost entirely by top-line growth. As interest rates rose and public market valuations for technology-oriented insurers compressed, the limitations of revenue multiples became apparent: a high multiple on revenue means little if the underlying [[Definition:Loss ratio | loss ratio]] is unsustainable or if [[Definition:Customer acquisition cost | customer acquisition costs]] consume margins indefinitely. Experienced insurance investors therefore use revenue multiples as a screening tool rather than a definitive measure, combining them with [[Definition:Combined ratio | combined ratio]] analysis, [[Definition:Embedded value | embedded value]] calculations, or discounted cash flow models to arrive at a holistic valuation. In [[Definition:Mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;amp;A) | M&amp;amp;A]] transactions involving brokers and MGAs, observable revenue multiples from comparable deals provide critical benchmarking, but the acquirer&amp;#039;s willingness to pay ultimately depends on the quality, [[Definition:Persistency | persistency]], and profitability of the revenue being acquired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Valuation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;amp;A)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Embedded value]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Book value]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Insurtech]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Managing general agent (MGA)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>