<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3APrudential_person_principle</id>
	<title>Definition:Prudential person principle - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3APrudential_person_principle"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Prudential_person_principle&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-14T21:29:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Prudential_person_principle&amp;diff=18115&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Prudential_person_principle&amp;diff=18115&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-15T17:06:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;⚖️ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Prudential person principle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a governance and investment standard embedded in insurance regulatory frameworks — most prominently in the European Union&amp;#039;s [[Definition:Solvency II | Solvency II]] directive — that requires insurers to invest their assets as a prudent person would, considering the nature and duration of their [[Definition:Insurance liability | liabilities]], the interests of [[Definition:Policyholder | policyholders]], and the overall security, quality, liquidity, and profitability of the [[Definition:Investment portfolio | portfolio]]. Rather than prescribing rigid quantitative limits on specific asset classes, the principle takes a principles-based approach: it trusts insurer management and boards to exercise sound judgment in [[Definition:Asset-liability management (ALM) | asset-liability management]], provided they can demonstrate that their investment decisions are appropriate given their [[Definition:Risk profile | risk profile]] and obligations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
📐 Under Solvency II, the prudential person principle operates as a qualitative overlay to the quantitative [[Definition:Solvency capital requirement (SCR) | solvency capital requirement]] and [[Definition:Minimum capital requirement (MCR) | minimum capital requirement]] calculations. Insurers must establish robust investment governance processes, including clear mandates, risk limits, and oversight structures that ensure compliance with the principle. The [[Definition:Insurance regulator | national supervisory authority]] evaluates an insurer&amp;#039;s adherence through the [[Definition:Supervisory review process (SRP) | supervisory review process]], examining whether the company&amp;#039;s investment strategy appropriately matches the currency, duration, and volatility characteristics of its liabilities. While the Solvency II formulation is the most widely cited articulation, analogous principles exist in other jurisdictions — the [[Definition:International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) | IAIS]] Insurance Core Principles endorse a similar approach, and regulators in markets such as Japan and Singapore incorporate prudent-person-style expectations into their supervisory frameworks, albeit with varying degrees of prescription.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🛡️ By anchoring investment governance in judgment rather than rigid rules, the prudential person principle grants insurers the flexibility to construct diversified portfolios that may include [[Definition:Alternative investment | alternative investments]], [[Definition:Infrastructure debt | infrastructure debt]], or [[Definition:Insurance-linked securities (ILS) | insurance-linked securities]] — asset classes that prescriptive regimes might inadvertently restrict. This flexibility, however, comes with heightened accountability: boards and senior management must be prepared to justify every material investment decision to supervisors and demonstrate that they have the expertise and systems to manage the associated risks. The principle has proven particularly consequential as insurers navigate low-interest-rate environments and seek yield in less traditional asset classes, ensuring that the pursuit of returns does not compromise the security of [[Definition:Policyholder | policyholder]] obligations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Solvency II]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Asset-liability management (ALM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Solvency capital requirement (SCR)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Investment portfolio]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Enterprise risk management (ERM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Insurance regulator]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>