<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AOverride_commission_%28overrider%29</id>
	<title>Definition:Override commission (overrider) - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AOverride_commission_%28overrider%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Override_commission_(overrider)&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-01T03:13:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Override_commission_(overrider)&amp;diff=18606&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Override_commission_(overrider)&amp;diff=18606&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-16T06:59:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;💰 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Override commission (overrider)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a supplemental [[Definition:Commission | commission]] payment made by an [[Definition:Insurance carrier | insurer]] — or in some cases by a [[Definition:Managing general agent (MGA) | managing general agent]] — to an [[Definition:Insurance intermediary | intermediary]] on top of the standard base commission, typically tied to the achievement of volume, profitability, or growth targets over a defined period. Unlike the standard commission that attaches to each individual policy sold, an overrider is usually calculated on the aggregate performance of a book of business, making it a strategic incentive mechanism designed to align intermediary behavior with insurer objectives. The term is used across global insurance markets, though its structure and regulatory treatment vary considerably between jurisdictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ Overriders are most commonly structured as a percentage of [[Definition:Gross written premium (GWP) | gross written premium]] earned once a specified threshold is reached — for instance, an additional two percentage points on all premium once annual volume exceeds a target figure, or a profit-sharing override triggered when the [[Definition:Loss ratio | loss ratio]] on the introduced business falls below an agreed benchmark. Some arrangements combine both volume and profitability conditions, creating a tiered incentive. In the [[Definition:Lloyd&amp;#039;s of London | Lloyd&amp;#039;s]] and London market, overriders are a familiar feature of [[Definition:Binding authority agreement | binding authority]] and [[Definition:Lineslip | lineslip]] arrangements, where they reward [[Definition:Lloyd&amp;#039;s coverholder | coverholders]] or [[Definition:Insurance broker | brokers]] for maintaining portfolio quality. In the reinsurance broking space, overriders paid to [[Definition:Reinsurance broker | reinsurance intermediaries]] can form a significant part of total broker compensation. Contractually, overriders are documented in the agency or broking agreement and may be subject to clawback provisions if loss experience deteriorates after payment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🔎 Regulators have scrutinized override commissions because of the potential for conflicts of interest. When an intermediary stands to earn substantially more by directing volume to a particular insurer, there is a risk that placement decisions could be influenced by compensation rather than the best interests of the [[Definition:Policyholder | policyholder]]. The [[Definition:Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | FCA]] in the UK, EIOPA&amp;#039;s guidance under the [[Definition:Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD) | IDD]], and various state insurance regulators in the United States have all addressed contingent commission arrangements — of which overriders are a subset — requiring enhanced [[Definition:Disclosure | disclosure]] to customers and, in some cases, insurer-level governance over how such incentives are set. The New York Attorney General&amp;#039;s investigation into contingent commissions in the early 2000s, which led to industrywide reforms in U.S. broker compensation practices, remains a landmark episode. Despite the scrutiny, overriders persist because they serve a legitimate economic function: rewarding intermediaries for building profitable, well-managed portfolios and providing insurers with a variable cost structure that links distribution spend to underwriting outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Commission]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Contingent commission]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Profit commission]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Brokerage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Binding authority agreement]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Disclosure]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>