<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AOutsourcing_policy</id>
	<title>Definition:Outsourcing policy - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AOutsourcing_policy"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Outsourcing_policy&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-02T19:14:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Outsourcing_policy&amp;diff=19306&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Outsourcing_policy&amp;diff=19306&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-16T11:31:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;📑 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Outsourcing policy&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a formal governance document that an insurer is required to maintain under [[Definition:Solvency II | Solvency II]] and other regulatory frameworks, setting out the principles, procedures, and controls governing the delegation of business functions or activities to external service providers. In the insurance industry — where [[Definition:Outsourcing | outsourcing]] arrangements span [[Definition:Claims | claims]] administration, [[Definition:Policy administration | policy administration]], [[Definition:Information technology | IT]] infrastructure, [[Definition:Actuarial function | actuarial]] services, [[Definition:Investment management | investment management]], and increasingly [[Definition:Underwriting | underwriting]] via [[Definition:Managing general agent (MGA) | MGAs]] and [[Definition:Coverholder | coverholders]] — the policy ensures that the [[Definition:Board of directors | board]] retains ultimate accountability for outsourced activities and that regulatory standards are not diluted by the involvement of third parties. The requirement reflects a core supervisory principle: an insurer cannot delegate responsibility by delegating a function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ A compliant outsourcing policy typically addresses several dimensions. It defines criteria for identifying [[Definition:Critical or important function | critical or important functions]] — those whose failure would materially impair the insurer&amp;#039;s ability to operate, meet policyholder obligations, or comply with regulatory requirements — and subjects these to enhanced oversight, including mandatory contractual provisions, [[Definition:Service level agreement (SLA) | service level agreements]], audit rights, and contingency plans for provider failure. The policy prescribes a due diligence process for selecting providers, covering financial stability, technical competence, [[Definition:Information security | data security]] practices, and [[Definition:Business continuity planning (BCP) | business continuity]] capabilities. Ongoing monitoring obligations require the insurer to regularly assess provider performance, manage concentration risk where multiple functions depend on a single vendor, and maintain the ability to bring activities back in-house or transfer them to an alternative provider if necessary. Under Solvency II, the policy must be approved by the [[Definition:Administrative, management, or supervisory body (AMSB) | AMSB]] and reviewed at least annually. Comparable expectations apply under the [[Definition:Insurance Core Principles (ICP) | Insurance Core Principles]] of the [[Definition:International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) | IAIS]], as well as under specific national regimes such as the [[Definition:Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) | PRA&amp;#039;s]] rules in the UK and the [[Definition:Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) | MAS]] guidelines in Singapore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
💡 The growing reliance of insurers on [[Definition:Insurtech | insurtech]] platforms, [[Definition:Cloud computing | cloud]] providers, and specialized third-party administrators has made outsourcing governance far more than a compliance formality. High-profile operational disruptions — including [[Definition:Cyber risk | cyber incidents]] at third-party vendors and failures of [[Definition:Delegated underwriting authority (DUA) | delegated authority]] partners to maintain adequate [[Definition:Internal controls | controls]] — have reinforced the message that outsourcing risk is operational risk in its most tangible form. Regulators have responded with heightened scrutiny, including the EU&amp;#039;s [[Definition:Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) | Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)]], which imposes detailed requirements on [[Definition:ICT risk | ICT]] third-party risk management for financial institutions including insurers. For insurance leaders, a robust outsourcing policy is not just a regulatory artifact — it is the governance backbone that enables the industry&amp;#039;s increasingly modular, partnership-driven business models to function without undermining policyholder protection or operational integrity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Critical or important function]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Delegated underwriting authority (DUA)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Operational risk module]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:System of governance]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Solvency II]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>