<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ANet_retention_analysis</id>
	<title>Definition:Net retention analysis - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ANet_retention_analysis"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Net_retention_analysis&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-02T16:41:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Net_retention_analysis&amp;diff=18795&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Net_retention_analysis&amp;diff=18795&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-16T08:53:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;📊 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Net retention analysis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the process by which an [[Definition:Insurance carrier | insurer]] or [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurer]] evaluates how much risk it retains on its own books after all [[Definition:Cession | cessions]] to reinsurance programs have been accounted for. Unlike a simple look at gross exposures, this analysis drills into the layered structure of an insurer&amp;#039;s [[Definition:Reinsurance program | reinsurance program]] — including [[Definition:Quota share | quota shares]], [[Definition:Excess of loss reinsurance | excess of loss treaties]], and [[Definition:Facultative reinsurance | facultative placements]] — to determine the true amount of loss the company would bear under various scenarios. The analysis is fundamental to [[Definition:Capital management | capital management]], [[Definition:Risk appetite | risk appetite]] calibration, and strategic planning across all major insurance markets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ Conducting a net retention analysis typically involves modeling a range of [[Definition:Loss scenario | loss scenarios]], from attritional losses to [[Definition:Catastrophe risk | catastrophe events]], and tracing how each scenario flows through the insurer&amp;#039;s reinsurance tower. Actuaries and risk managers map [[Definition:Gross written premium (GWP) | gross exposures]] against the specific terms, [[Definition:Attachment point | attachment points]], and limits of each reinsurance layer to calculate the residual exposure that remains with the [[Definition:Cedant | cedant]]. Under [[Definition:Solvency II | Solvency II]] in Europe, this work feeds directly into the [[Definition:Solvency capital requirement (SCR) | solvency capital requirement]] calculations, while in the United States, it informs [[Definition:Risk-based capital (RBC) | risk-based capital]] assessments overseen by the [[Definition:National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) | NAIC]]. In markets governed by [[Definition:C-ROSS | C-ROSS]] in China or the frameworks administered by regulators in Japan and Singapore, similar retention analyses are embedded in regulatory capital reporting, though the specific methodologies differ.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
💡 Underestimating net retention has historically been a root cause of insurer distress — companies that assumed their reinsurance would respond fully in a severe event have sometimes discovered gaps created by [[Definition:Aggregate limit | aggregate limits]], [[Definition:Reinstatement | reinstatement]] exhaustion, or [[Definition:Reinsurer | reinsurer]] credit failures. A rigorous net retention analysis protects against such surprises by quantifying worst-case retained losses and stress-testing them against available [[Definition:Surplus | surplus]]. Rating agencies such as [[Definition:AM Best | AM Best]] and [[Definition:S&amp;amp;P Global Ratings | S&amp;amp;P Global Ratings]] routinely scrutinize net retention metrics when assigning [[Definition:Financial strength rating | financial strength ratings]], making the analysis not just an internal risk tool but a key factor in external market credibility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Reinsurance program]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Cession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Attachment point]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Risk appetite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Solvency capital requirement (SCR)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>