<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AMaterial_non-disclosure</id>
	<title>Definition:Material non-disclosure - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AMaterial_non-disclosure"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Material_non-disclosure&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-19T03:24:20Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Material_non-disclosure&amp;diff=21287&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Material_non-disclosure&amp;diff=21287&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-20T07:43:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;⚠️ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Material non-disclosure&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; occurs when an applicant for insurance fails to reveal a fact that would have influenced a prudent [[Definition:Underwriting | underwriter&amp;#039;s]] decision to accept the risk or the terms on which it was written — a concept rooted in the [[Definition:Duty of utmost good faith | duty of utmost good faith]] (uberrimae fidei) that has shaped insurance law for centuries. In [[Definition:Aviation insurance | aviation]], [[Definition:Marine insurance | marine]], and [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurance]] markets, where placement still relies heavily on information voluntarily disclosed by the insured and presented by the [[Definition:Insurance broker | broker]], material non-disclosure remains one of the most consequential grounds on which an insurer can void a policy or deny a claim. The concept applies globally, though its legal treatment varies: English law under the Insurance Act 2015 moved toward proportionate remedies based on what the insurer would have done with the information, while many civil-law jurisdictions and certain U.S. state laws apply different standards of intent and consequence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🔍 The practical operation of non-disclosure disputes turns on two questions: was the undisclosed fact &amp;quot;material,&amp;quot; and did the insured know or ought to have known about it? In [[Definition:Aviation insurance | aviation]], materiality is judged from the underwriter&amp;#039;s perspective — if a reasonable aviation underwriter would consider a pilot&amp;#039;s undisclosed medical condition, a history of maintenance lapses, or a previous insurance cancellation relevant to the risk assessment, then the failure to volunteer that information constitutes material non-disclosure. Brokers play a gatekeeping role, as the [[Definition:Insurance broker | broker&amp;#039;s]] duty to present the risk fairly includes ensuring that all material facts are disclosed in the submission. When non-disclosure comes to light — typically during [[Definition:Claims handling | claims investigation]] — the insurer may seek to avoid the policy ab initio (from inception) or, under more modern regimes, apply a proportionate remedy such as adjusting the claim payout to reflect the terms that would have applied had full disclosure been made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚖️ The stakes of material non-disclosure are especially high in large-value classes such as [[Definition:Hull all risks (HAR) | hull all risks]], [[Definition:Leased aircraft insurance | leased aircraft insurance]], and [[Definition:Directors and officers liability insurance (D&amp;amp;O) | directors&amp;#039; and officers&amp;#039; liability]], where a single voided policy can leave the insured — and any third parties relying on that coverage, such as lessors or lenders — without protection precisely when they need it most. This risk drives the insurance industry&amp;#039;s emphasis on thorough proposal forms, warranty declarations, and increasingly, [[Definition:Data analytics | data-driven]] pre-bind verification tools developed by [[Definition:Insurtech | insurtechs]]. The evolution toward continuous disclosure obligations in some market segments reflects a recognition that the traditional &amp;quot;snapshot at inception&amp;quot; model is inadequate for risks that change rapidly, pushing the boundary between non-disclosure and misrepresentation into new territory as regulators in the UK, EU, and Asia-Pacific refine their consumer protection and commercial insurance frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Duty of utmost good faith]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Misrepresentation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Warranty (insurance)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Policy voidance]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Underwriting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Insurance Act 2015]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>