<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ALook-through_approach</id>
	<title>Definition:Look-through approach - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ALook-through_approach"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Look-through_approach&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-03T08:13:29Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Look-through_approach&amp;diff=19289&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Look-through_approach&amp;diff=19289&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-16T11:31:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;🔍 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Look-through approach&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a valuation and risk-assessment methodology used in insurance regulation that requires an insurer to identify and evaluate the underlying exposures within collective investment vehicles, [[Definition:Special purpose vehicle (SPV) | special purpose vehicles]], and other pooled structures rather than treating the fund or vehicle as a single, opaque holding. The principle is straightforward: if an insurer owns shares in an equity fund, the [[Definition:Solvency capital requirement (SCR) | capital charge]] should reflect the actual equities, bonds, or derivatives inside that fund, not simply the fund&amp;#039;s wrapper. This approach is formally mandated under [[Definition:Solvency II | Solvency II]] and has parallels in other risk-based capital regimes, including Bermuda&amp;#039;s [[Definition:Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) | BMA]] framework and elements of China&amp;#039;s [[Definition:C-ROSS | C-ROSS]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ Applying the look-through in practice means an insurer must decompose each indirect holding into its constituent asset classes and run the relevant [[Definition:Stress test | stress scenarios]] — [[Definition:Market risk module | market risk]], [[Definition:Credit risk | credit risk]], [[Definition:Concentration risk | concentration risk]] — at the granular level. Under Solvency II&amp;#039;s Delegated Regulation, if the insurer cannot fully identify the underlying assets, it must treat the entire investment under the most punitive [[Definition:Capital charge | capital charge]] applicable to any asset the fund is permitted to hold according to its mandate. This creates a strong incentive for insurers to obtain transparent data from [[Definition:Asset manager | asset managers]] and fund administrators. The operational burden is significant: large insurers with diversified investment portfolios may hold hundreds of funds, each requiring periodic disaggregation and mapping to regulatory risk buckets. [[Definition:Insurtech | Insurtech]] and [[Definition:Regtech | regtech]] vendors have built dedicated platforms to automate this data collection, cleansing, and mapping process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
💡 Without the look-through approach, insurers could inadvertently — or deliberately — obscure concentrated or high-risk positions inside opaque fund structures, understating the true risk on their [[Definition:Balance sheet | balance sheet]] and the capital needed to support it. The approach therefore serves as a critical transparency mechanism, ensuring that [[Definition:Own funds | own funds]] are genuinely sufficient relative to actual economic exposures. It also affects investment strategy: insurers increasingly favor [[Definition:Separately managed account | separately managed accounts]] or funds that provide daily position-level transparency, partly because the data requirements of look-through compliance are easier to meet. For [[Definition:Risk management | risk management]] teams, the discipline of look-through analysis often uncovers unintended concentrations — for instance, multiple funds holding the same sovereign or corporate issuer — that would otherwise go unnoticed at the aggregate portfolio level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Market risk module]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Solvency II]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Solvency capital requirement (SCR)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Concentration risk]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Asset-liability management (ALM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Regtech]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>