PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON

2026-03-20T06:46:10Z

Bot: Creating new article from JSON

New page

📦 '''Institute cargo clauses (ICC)''' are the most widely used standard wordings for [[Definition:Cargo insurance | cargo insurance]] worldwide, drafted and maintained by the Institute of London Underwriters (now administered through the International Underwriting Association and Lloyd's Market Association Joint Cargo Committee). They come in three principal variants — ICC (A), ICC (B), and ICC (C) — each providing a different breadth of cover, from the all-risks protection of Clause (A) to the narrower named-perils coverage of Clauses (B) and (C). Although they originate in the London [[Definition:Insurance market | insurance market]], ICC wordings serve as the de facto international standard for [[Definition:Marine insurance | marine]] cargo placements, adopted or adapted by insurers across continental Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and the Americas.

🔍 ICC (A) operates on an all-risks basis, covering loss of or damage to the insured cargo from any external cause except those specifically excluded — such as inherent vice, delay, ordinary leakage, or wilful misconduct of the assured. ICC (B) and ICC (C) are named-perils forms that cover progressively fewer events: Clause (B) includes risks like fire, explosion, vessel stranding, earthquake, and washing overboard, while Clause (C) strips back further to the most catastrophic marine perils. All three sets share common exclusions and a similar structural framework, including provisions for [[Definition:General average (GA) | general average]] and salvage charges, transit duration clauses, and a duty-of-assured clause requiring reasonable care. Insurers routinely attach supplementary clauses — such as the [[Definition:Institute war clauses | Institute War Clauses]] (Cargo) and the [[Definition:Institute strikes clauses | Institute Strikes Clauses]] (Cargo) — because war and strikes perils are excluded from the standard ICC wordings.

🌍 The pervasive adoption of the Institute Cargo Clauses shapes how [[Definition:Premium | premiums]] are rated, how [[Definition:Claims | claims]] are adjusted, and how [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurance]] treaties are structured across the global cargo market. Because the wordings are standardized and well understood, they lower transaction costs and facilitate placement across multiple markets and [[Definition:Coinsurance | coinsurance]] panels. In jurisdictions such as Japan and China, local adaptations exist — the Japanese cargo clauses and the PICC (People's Insurance Company of China) clauses, for example — but these are often modeled on or benchmarked against the ICC framework. For [[Definition:Underwriting | underwriters]], the choice between ICC (A), (B), and (C) is a primary lever for controlling risk appetite and pricing, while for cargo owners and freight forwarders, understanding which clause set applies to a shipment is essential for identifying coverage gaps that may need to be addressed through [[Definition:Endorsement | endorsements]] or separate policies.

'''Related concepts:'''
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}
* [[Definition:Cargo insurance]]
* [[Definition:Marine insurance]]
* [[Definition:Institute war clauses]]
* [[Definition:Institute strikes clauses]]
* [[Definition:General average (GA)]]
* [[Definition:All-risks insurance]]
{{Div col end}}

Definition:Institute cargo clauses (ICC) - Revision history

PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON