<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AIndexation_clause</id>
	<title>Definition:Indexation clause - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AIndexation_clause"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Indexation_clause&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-15T06:59:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Indexation_clause&amp;diff=18757&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Indexation_clause&amp;diff=18757&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-16T08:52:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;📋 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Indexation clause&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a contractual provision within an [[Definition:Insurance policy | insurance]] or [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurance]] agreement that specifies how and when monetary values — such as [[Definition:Sum insured | sums insured]], [[Definition:Policy limit | limits]], [[Definition:Deductible | deductibles]], [[Definition:Attachment point | attachment points]], or [[Definition:Premium | premiums]] — will be adjusted in accordance with the movement of a designated index. These clauses formalize the [[Definition:Indexation | indexation]] process by defining the reference index, the frequency of adjustment, the base date from which changes are measured, and the specific elements of the contract subject to modification. They are particularly prevalent in [[Definition:Property insurance | property]], [[Definition:Engineering insurance | engineering]], and long-tail [[Definition:Liability insurance | liability]] lines, as well as in [[Definition:Excess of loss reinsurance | excess of loss]] reinsurance treaties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ A typical indexation clause will reference a publicly available index — such as a consumer price index, building cost index, or industry-specific inflation measure — and stipulate that the relevant contract values be scaled proportionally to the index&amp;#039;s movement from an agreed base period. In reinsurance, the clause often applies to the [[Definition:Retention | retention]] and limit of an excess of loss cover, ensuring that the reinsurer&amp;#039;s exposure remains consistent in real terms even as underlying claim costs inflate. The precise wording matters enormously: a poorly drafted clause can create ambiguity about whether the adjustment applies to both the attachment and the limit, or only one of them, and whether negative index movements (deflation) trigger a downward adjustment. Markets such as [[Definition:Lloyd&amp;#039;s of London | Lloyd&amp;#039;s]] have developed standardized clause wordings over the decades, while in Continental European and Asian markets, bespoke drafting remains common, reflecting local conventions and regulatory expectations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🔍 The practical significance of an indexation clause extends well beyond administrative convenience. For [[Definition:Cedant | cedants]], it guards against the real erosion of reinsurance protection over multi-year contract periods, particularly in inflationary environments where original loss estimates can be rapidly overtaken by actual costs. For [[Definition:Reinsurer | reinsurers]], the clause provides transparency and predictability in how their exposure will evolve, feeding directly into [[Definition:Pricing | pricing]] models and [[Definition:Loss reserve | reserve]] projections. Disputes over indexation clauses have occasionally generated significant litigation and [[Definition:Arbitration | arbitration]], especially when unanticipated surges in inflation cause attachment points to rise sharply and shift more loss back to the cedant than originally contemplated. Careful negotiation and clear drafting at the placement stage remain the best defense against such outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Indexation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Excess of loss reinsurance]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Attachment point]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Inflationary guard]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Stability clause]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Treaty reinsurance]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>