<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AImpact_tolerance</id>
	<title>Definition:Impact tolerance - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AImpact_tolerance"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Impact_tolerance&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-04T00:26:36Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Impact_tolerance&amp;diff=20903&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Impact_tolerance&amp;diff=20903&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-19T13:37:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;🎯 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Impact tolerance&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a regulatory and [[Definition:Enterprise risk management (ERM) | risk management]] concept that defines the maximum level of disruption an insurance firm can tolerate to an important business service before the disruption causes intolerable harm to policyholders, market integrity, or the firm&amp;#039;s own safety and soundness. Originating from the UK&amp;#039;s operational resilience framework — developed jointly by the [[Definition:Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) | PRA]], the Financial Conduct Authority, and the Bank of England — impact tolerances require insurers to move beyond traditional [[Definition:Business continuity planning (BCP) | business continuity planning]] and instead start from the perspective of the consumer and the system: what outcomes must be protected, and how much degradation is acceptable before those outcomes are compromised?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ Setting an impact tolerance begins with identifying a firm&amp;#039;s important business services — for an insurer, these might include processing new [[Definition:Policy | policy]] applications, handling [[Definition:Claims | claims]] payments, or maintaining [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurance]] settlement operations. For each service, the firm defines a quantitative or qualitative boundary: for example, a maximum time period during which claims payments could be delayed before policyholders experience serious harm. The insurer must then map the people, processes, technology, facilities, and [[Definition:Third-party service provider | third-party providers]] that support each service and conduct scenario testing to determine whether it can stay within tolerance under severe but plausible disruption events — such as a major cyberattack, the sudden failure of a critical [[Definition:Information technology outsourcing (ITO) | IT outsourcing]] provider, or a widespread pandemic. Gaps identified through this mapping and testing process must be remediated within a defined transition period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🔑 Although the concept was pioneered in the UK, its influence has spread internationally as regulators in other markets recognize that traditional risk frameworks — focused on preventing disruptions — must be supplemented by acceptance that some disruptions are inevitable. The [[Definition:European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) | EIOPA]]&amp;#039;s work on [[Definition:Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) | DORA]] and supervisory expectations in jurisdictions like Hong Kong, Singapore, and Australia reflect parallel thinking about operational resilience for financial services, including insurers. For insurance executives, impact tolerances shift the conversation from &amp;quot;how do we prevent every outage?&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;how quickly must we recover, and what investments are justified to ensure we can?&amp;quot; This reframing has driven material changes in [[Definition:Outsourcing | outsourcing]] strategies, [[Definition:Vendor management | vendor concentration]] decisions, and technology architecture across the industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Operational resilience]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Business continuity planning (BCP)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Enterprise risk management (ERM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Operational risk]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Outsourcing]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>