<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AExposure_database</id>
	<title>Definition:Exposure database - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AExposure_database"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Exposure_database&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-01T04:11:02Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Exposure_database&amp;diff=18730&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Exposure_database&amp;diff=18730&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-16T08:51:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;🗄️ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Exposure database&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a structured repository containing detailed information about the risks an [[Definition:Insurance carrier | insurer]] or [[Definition:Reinsurer | reinsurer]] has on its books — including policy locations, insured values, construction types, occupancy classes, and other attributes needed to assess vulnerability to [[Definition:Loss | loss]]. In [[Definition:Property insurance | property]] and [[Definition:Catastrophe reinsurance | catastrophe reinsurance]], the exposure database is the foundational input for [[Definition:Catastrophe model | catastrophe models]], enabling carriers to estimate potential losses from events such as hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, and wildfires. Maintaining a high-quality exposure database is not merely a best practice — regulators in [[Definition:Solvency II | Solvency II]] jurisdictions, under the [[Definition:Risk-based capital (RBC) | RBC]] framework in the United States, and within regimes like [[Definition:China Risk Oriented Solvency System (C-ROSS) | C-ROSS]] in China all expect firms to demonstrate they understand their aggregate exposures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ Building and maintaining an exposure database involves ingesting data from multiple sources: policy administration systems, [[Definition:Bordereaux | bordereaux]] reports from [[Definition:Managing general agent (MGA) | MGAs]] and [[Definition:Coverholder | coverholders]], [[Definition:Broker | broker]] submissions, and third-party geocoding and enrichment services. Each record typically includes the geographic coordinates (or at minimum a postal code) of the insured property, the [[Definition:Total insured value (TIV) | total insured value]], the type of coverage, policy terms such as [[Definition:Deductible | deductibles]] and [[Definition:Sublimit | sublimits]], and physical characteristics of the structure. Data quality challenges are pervasive: incomplete addresses, missing construction details, and inconsistent formatting across different source systems can degrade modeling accuracy. [[Definition:Insurtech | Insurtech]] vendors have emerged to address these gaps, offering automated validation, geocoding, and enrichment tools that cleanse raw exposure data before it enters catastrophe modeling platforms from firms like [[Definition:Moody&amp;#039;s RMS | Moody&amp;#039;s RMS]], [[Definition:Verisk | Verisk]], and [[Definition:CoreLogic | CoreLogic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🔍 The quality of an exposure database directly determines how much confidence [[Definition:Underwriter | underwriters]], [[Definition:Actuary | actuaries]], and senior management can place in their [[Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML) | probable maximum loss]] estimates and [[Definition:Accumulation risk | accumulation]] controls. Poor data leads to model output that understates or overstates risk, with potentially severe consequences: underestimation can leave a company dangerously underreserved heading into a catastrophe season, while overestimation ties up capital unnecessarily and erodes competitiveness. Rating agencies such as [[Definition:AM Best | AM Best]] and [[Definition:S&amp;amp;P Global Ratings | S&amp;amp;P Global Ratings]] routinely scrutinize exposure data governance as part of their [[Definition:Enterprise risk management (ERM) | enterprise risk management]] assessments, and major reinsurers increasingly require cedents to submit exposure data in standardized formats as a condition of treaty placement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Catastrophe model]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Total insured value (TIV)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Accumulation risk]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Bordereaux]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Data quality]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>