<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ABusiness_continuity_policy</id>
	<title>Definition:Business continuity policy - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3ABusiness_continuity_policy"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Business_continuity_policy&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-02T12:52:13Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Business_continuity_policy&amp;diff=20502&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Business_continuity_policy&amp;diff=20502&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-18T02:30:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;🛡️ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Business continuity policy&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a formal governance document that establishes an insurance organization&amp;#039;s commitment, framework, and accountability structure for maintaining critical operations during and after disruptive events — whether those events are natural catastrophes, cyberattacks, pandemics, technology failures, or the loss of key third-party service providers. For insurers, business continuity carries a dual significance: the company must protect its own operational resilience while simultaneously fulfilling its core promise to [[Definition:Policyholder | policyholders]] — paying [[Definition:Claims | claims]] precisely when disruption strikes. Regulatory frameworks across major markets mandate that insurers maintain robust business continuity arrangements. The [[Definition:Solvency II | Solvency II]] system of governance requirements, the [[Definition:National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) | NAIC]]&amp;#039;s model standards in the United States, the [[Definition:Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) | MAS]] guidelines in Singapore, and Japan&amp;#039;s [[Definition:Financial Services Agency (FSA) | FSA]] expectations all require documented policies that are approved at [[Definition:Board of directors | board level]] and tested regularly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
⚙️ The policy itself typically sets out the scope of the business continuity program, defines roles and responsibilities — often anchoring accountability with senior management or a dedicated [[Definition:Board committee | board committee]] — and establishes requirements for [[Definition:Business impact analysis | business impact analyses]], [[Definition:Disaster recovery | disaster recovery]] plans, and testing schedules. In practice, an insurer&amp;#039;s business continuity planning must cover a wide operational surface: [[Definition:Underwriting | underwriting]] platforms, [[Definition:Claims | claims]] processing systems, [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurance]] administration, [[Definition:Policy administration system | policy administration]], call centers, and payment infrastructure all need continuity provisions. The growing reliance on [[Definition:Outsourcing | outsourced]] services — including cloud-hosted [[Definition:Core system | core systems]], [[Definition:Third-party administrator (TPA) | third-party claims administrators]], and [[Definition:Managing general agent (MGA) | MGAs]] operating under [[Definition:Delegated underwriting authority (DUA) | delegated authority]] — means the policy must also address [[Definition:Third-party risk management | third-party resilience]] and require contractual continuity obligations from vendors. Testing typically includes tabletop exercises, simulated outage scenarios, and, for larger insurers, full failover drills of IT infrastructure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
💡 The COVID-19 pandemic served as a real-world stress test of business continuity policies across the global insurance industry, exposing gaps in remote-work readiness, digital claims handling, and [[Definition:Supply chain | supply chain]] resilience that many firms had underestimated. Regulators responded by intensifying supervisory expectations: the [[Definition:Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) | PRA]] in the UK, for example, introduced operational resilience requirements that go beyond traditional business continuity planning by requiring insurers to define &amp;quot;impact tolerances&amp;quot; for important business services — including [[Definition:Claims | claims]] payment timelines. Insurers operating in [[Definition:Lloyd&amp;#039;s | Lloyd&amp;#039;s]] market face additional continuity expectations from the Corporation of Lloyd&amp;#039;s. For [[Definition:Insurtech | insurtech]] firms and digitally native [[Definition:Managing general agent (MGA) | MGAs]], the policy must address the concentration risk inherent in heavy dependence on a small number of technology platforms. A well-maintained business continuity policy is not just a compliance artifact — it is the foundation that allows an insurer to honor its obligations when the events it underwrites actually occur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Disaster recovery]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Operational resilience]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Operational risk]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Outsourcing]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Enterprise risk management (ERM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Regulatory compliance]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>