<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
	<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AAlgorithmic_audit</id>
	<title>Definition:Algorithmic audit - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Definition%3AAlgorithmic_audit"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Algorithmic_audit&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-30T07:53:21Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Algorithmic_audit&amp;diff=8519&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>PlumBot: Bot: Creating new article from JSON</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.insurerbrain.com/w/index.php?title=Definition:Algorithmic_audit&amp;diff=8519&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-03-11T04:17:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bot: Creating new article from JSON&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;🔎 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Algorithmic audit&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a structured evaluation of an automated decision-making system — typically a [[Definition:Machine learning | machine-learning]] or [[Definition:Artificial intelligence (AI) | AI]] model — to assess whether it performs as intended, complies with applicable [[Definition:Insurance regulation | insurance regulations]], and avoids [[Definition:Unfair discrimination | unfairly discriminatory]] outcomes against protected classes. Within the insurance sector, these audits scrutinize models used for [[Definition:Underwriting | underwriting]] eligibility, [[Definition:Algorithmic pricing | algorithmic pricing]], [[Definition:Claims handling | claims triage]], and [[Definition:Fraud detection | fraud scoring]], where flawed or biased outputs can expose carriers to regulatory sanctions, litigation, and reputational harm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
📊 A comprehensive audit typically follows a phased approach. First, auditors document the model&amp;#039;s purpose, training data lineage, and feature engineering choices. Next, they run statistical tests — such as [[Definition:Disparate impact | disparate-impact]] ratios, equalized-odds checks, and sensitivity analyses — to determine whether the model treats policyholders or applicants differently based on race, gender, zip code, or other proxies for protected characteristics. The audit also examines operational integrity: Is the model receiving the data it was designed for? Have input distributions shifted since deployment? Finally, auditors produce a findings report with remediation recommendations, which the carrier&amp;#039;s [[Definition:Model risk management | model-risk governance]] body reviews before certifying the model for continued use. Colorado&amp;#039;s landmark 2023 AI governance regulation, for example, requires [[Definition:Insurance carrier | insurers]] to perform such testing on life-insurance algorithms and report results to the [[Definition:Insurance regulator | division of insurance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🛡️ Regular algorithmic audits are rapidly becoming table stakes rather than a voluntary best practice. [[Definition:National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) | NAIC]] working groups have published model bulletins encouraging states to require that carriers demonstrate ongoing oversight of their [[Definition:Predictive model | predictive models]]. For [[Definition:Insurtech | insurtech]] startups seeking to partner with established carriers, presenting a clean audit trail can accelerate [[Definition:Delegated underwriting authority (DUA) | delegated-authority]] approvals and [[Definition:Reinsurance | reinsurance]] placements. Internally, audits surface data-quality issues and model decay before they materialize as financial or compliance problems — making them as much a tool for operational excellence as for regulatory defense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related concepts:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Algorithmic accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Algorithmic transparency]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Model risk management]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Unfair discrimination]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Predictive model]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Definition:Regulatory compliance]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Div col end}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>PlumBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>