View source for Definition:Attorney-client privilege

🔒 '''Attorney-client privilege''' in the insurance context is a legal doctrine that protects confidential communications between an [[Definition:Insurance carrier | insurer]] (or its employees) and legal counsel from disclosure to third parties, including [[Definition:Policyholder | policyholders]], claimants, and [[Definition:Insurance regulation | regulators]]. The privilege takes on particular complexity in insurance because carriers routinely engage attorneys not only for corporate legal advice but also to investigate, evaluate, and defend [[Definition:Claim | claims]] — blurring the line between legal counsel and ordinary business functions. Courts have wrestled extensively with whether communications generated during [[Definition:Claims management | claims handling]] are privileged legal advice or routine adjusting work, and the answer varies significantly by jurisdiction.

📋 When an insurer retains outside counsel to provide a coverage opinion on a disputed claim, or when in-house attorneys advise on [[Definition:Reserve | reserve]] adequacy with an eye toward potential litigation, those communications are typically protected — provided the primary purpose is obtaining legal guidance rather than making a business decision. However, documents created by [[Definition:Claims adjuster | claims adjusters]] in the ordinary course of evaluating a loss may not qualify, even if an attorney is copied on the correspondence. The distinction matters acutely in [[Definition:Bad faith | bad faith]] litigation, where plaintiffs seek access to the insurer's internal claim file to demonstrate unreasonable conduct. Insurers often implement "litigation hold" protocols and carefully structure their communication workflows to preserve the privilege, separating legal analysis from factual investigation wherever possible.

⚠️ Mishandling privilege can expose an insurer to devastating consequences in coverage disputes and regulatory examinations. Once a privileged communication is inadvertently disclosed — through careless document production or poorly managed [[Definition:Audit | audit]] responses — the protection may be waived, potentially opening the insurer's entire legal strategy to opposing counsel. For [[Definition:Insurtech | insurtechs]] and technology-forward carriers that rely on digital [[Definition:Claims management | claims platforms]] and shared data environments, maintaining privilege boundaries requires deliberate system design — ensuring that legal analysis is segmented from operational data accessible to business users, vendors, or [[Definition:Third-party administrator (TPA) | third-party administrators]].

'''Related concepts'''
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}
* [[Definition:Bad faith]]
* [[Definition:Claims management]]
* [[Definition:Coverage opinion]]
* [[Definition:Litigation management]]
* [[Definition:Work product doctrine]]
* [[Definition:Reservation of rights]]
{{Div col end}}